These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging. Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR. Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T. Siepmann DB; McGovern J; Brittain JH; Reeder SB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1510-5. PubMed ID: 18029893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences. Kornaat PR; Reeder SB; Koo S; Brittain JH; Yu H; Andriacchi TP; Gold GE Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Apr; 13(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 15780647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved spectral selectivity and reduced susceptibility in SSFP using a near zero TE undersampled three-dimensional PR sequence. Lu A; Barger AV; Grist TM; Block WF J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jan; 19(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 14696228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Articular cartilage of the knee: rapid three-dimensional MR imaging at 3.0 T with IDEAL balanced steady-state free precession--initial experience. Gold GE; Reeder SB; Yu H; Kornaat P; Shimakawa AS; Johnson JW; Pelc NJ; Beaulieu CF; Brittain JH Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16801369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model. Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy. Bauer JS; Krause SJ; Ross CJ; Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Ozhinsky E; Majumdar S; Link TM Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T. Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image. Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-resolution cartilage imaging of the knee at 3T: basic evaluation of modern isotropic 3D MR-sequences. Friedrich KM; Reiter G; Kaiser B; Mayerhöfer M; Deimling M; Jellus V; Horger W; Trattnig S; Schweitzer M; Salomonowitz E Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):398-405. PubMed ID: 20138723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid musculoskeletal MRI with phase-sensitive steady-state free precession: comparison with routine knee MRI. Vasanawala SS; Hargreaves BA; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Beaulieu CF; Gold GE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1450-5. PubMed ID: 15855095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions. Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional double-echo steady-state (3D-DESS) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: establishment of flip angles for evaluation of cartilage at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Moriya S; Miki Y; Matsuno Y; Okada M Acta Radiol; 2012 Sep; 53(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 22850576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]