172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12540823)
1. Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.
Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; So JC; Dutta AK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12540823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system.
E A; A Y; T O
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110893. PubMed ID: 37321050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the threshold detail detectability of a screen-film combination and computed radiology under conditions relevant to high-kVp chest radiography.
Launders JH; Cowen AR
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1393-8. PubMed ID: 7480121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication (PACS) systems using a contrast detail test object.
Weatherburn GC; Davies JG
Br J Radiol; 1999 Sep; 72(861):856-63. PubMed ID: 10645191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography.
Honey ID; Mackenzie A; Evans DS
Br J Radiol; 2005 May; 78(929):422-7. PubMed ID: 15845936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Filter materials for dose reduction in screen-film radiography.
Koedooder K; Venema HW
Phys Med Biol; 1986 Jun; 31(6):585-600. PubMed ID: 3755830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification.
Xu T; Ducote JL; Wong JT; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 16872069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed radiography as a gamma ray detector--dose response and applications.
O'Keeffe DS; McLeod RW
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3559-72. PubMed ID: 15446787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography.
Aufrichtig R; Xue P
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2653-69. PubMed ID: 11008963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
