These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12541235)

  • 1. Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite.
    Moelker A; Vogel MW; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 12541235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Importance of bone-conducted sound transmission on patient hearing in the MR scanner.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Vogel MW; Ouhlous M; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 15971178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nordell A; Lundh M; Horsch S; Hallberg B; Aden U; Nordell B; Blennow M
    Acta Paediatr; 2009 Aug; 98(8):1278-83. PubMed ID: 19432831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
    Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner.
    More SR; Lim TC; Li M; Holland CK; Boyce SE; Lee JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 16463341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging: evaluation of six "worst-case" pulse sequences.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM; Ziarati M
    Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 8134603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic FMRI noise: linear time-invariant system model.
    Rizzo Sierra CV; Versluis MJ; Hoogduin JM; Duifhuis HD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2115-23. PubMed ID: 18713680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Staud I; Frank G; Dammann F; Plontke S; Plinkert PK
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15220495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic field characterization of a clinical magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound system inside the magnet bore.
    Kothapalli SVVN; Altman MB; Partanen A; Wan L; Gach HM; Straube W; Hallahan DE; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 28626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Active-passive gradient shielding for MRI acoustic noise reduction.
    Edelstein WA; Kidane TK; Taracila V; Baig TN; Eagan TP; Cheng YC; Brown RW; Mallick JA
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 May; 53(5):1013-7. PubMed ID: 15844137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single point imaging with suppressed sound pressure levels through gradient-shape adjustment.
    Latta P; Gruwel ML; Edie E; Srámek M; Tomanek B
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Oct; 170(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 15388078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels.
    Moelker A; Wielopolski PA; Pattynama PM
    MAGMA; 2003 Feb; 16(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 12695886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multicenter trial and comparison with other pulse sequences.
    Miyati T; Banno T; Fujita H; Mase M; Narita H; Imazawa M; Ohba S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Aug; 18(8):733-6. PubMed ID: 10534055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of sound measurement systems for auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nam EC; Kim SS; Lee KU; Kim SS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 26(5):715-20. PubMed ID: 18440748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging.
    Hurwitz R; Lane SR; Bell RA; Brant-Zawadzki MN
    Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):545-8. PubMed ID: 2798888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interventional MR imaging at 1.5 T: quantification of sound exposure.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Lethimonnier F; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):889-95. PubMed ID: 12202729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of acoustic environment after traumatic noise exposure on hearing and outer hair cells.
    Tanaka C; Chen GD; Hu BH; Chi LH; Li M; Zheng G; Bielefeld EC; Jamesdaniel S; Coling D; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):10-8. PubMed ID: 19450428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation study of noise reduction methods for a split MRI system using a finite element method.
    Wang Y; Liu F; Crozier S
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7122-31. PubMed ID: 26632066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.