These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12542309)

  • 1. Removal of the natural hormone estrone from aqueous solutions using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
    Schäfer AI; Nghiem LD; Waite TD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Jan; 37(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 12542309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dsorption of estrone on nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in water and wastewater treatment.
    Nghiem LD; Schäfer AI; Waite TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):265-72. PubMed ID: 12361019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution and industrial effluent using reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.
    Kheriji J; Tabassi D; Hamrouni B
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(7):1206-16. PubMed ID: 26398037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of natural hormone estrone from secondary effluents using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
    Jin X; Hu J; Ong SL
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(2):638-48. PubMed ID: 19879623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chemisorption of estrone in nylon microfiltration membranes: Adsorption mechanism and potential use for estrone removal from water.
    Han J; Qiu W; Hu J; Gao W
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):873-81. PubMed ID: 22189293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms.
    Nghiem LD; Schäfer AI; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Mar; 38(6):1888-96. PubMed ID: 15074703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of antibiotics and estrogens by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Yang L; Xia C; Jiang J; Chen X; Zhou Y; Yuan C; Bai L; Meng S; Cao G
    J Hazard Mater; 2024 Jan; 461():132628. PubMed ID: 37783143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: a review.
    Shen J; Schäfer A
    Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():679-91. PubMed ID: 25461935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removal of pharmaceutically active compounds from water sources using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: Comparison of removal efficiencies and in-depth analysis of rejection mechanisms.
    Matin A; Jillani SMS; Baig U; Ihsanullah I; Alhooshani K
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117682. PubMed ID: 37003228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
    Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
    Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics and application of ceramic nanofiltration membranes.
    Weber R; Chmiel H; Mavrov V
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Mar; 984():178-93. PubMed ID: 12783817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.