These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12543478)

  • 1. Trade-offs between social behaviour and foraging by sheep in heterogeneous pastures.
    Sibbald AM; Hooper RJ
    Behav Processes; 2003 Feb; 61(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 12543478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of space allowance on the grazing behaviour and spacing of sheep.
    Sibbald AM; Shellard LJ; Smart TS
    Appl Anim Behav Sci; 2000 Nov; 70(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 10986423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategies for the avoidance of faeces by grazing sheep.
    Cooper J; Gordon IJ; Pike AW
    Appl Anim Behav Sci; 2000 Aug; 69(1):15-33. PubMed ID: 10856782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Foraging responses of sheep to plant spatial micro-patterns can cause diverse associational effects of focal plant at individual and population levels.
    Huang Y; Wang L; Wang D; Zeng DH; Li Y; Liu J; Wang Y
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):863-873. PubMed ID: 29430651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foraging strategy of cattle in patchy grassland.
    de Vries MF; Daleboudt C
    Oecologia; 1994 Nov; 100(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 28307033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resource heterogeneity and foraging behaviour of cattle across spatial scales.
    Utsumi SA; Cangiano CA; Galli JR; McEachern MB; Demment MW; Laca EA
    BMC Ecol; 2009 Apr; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19393094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of cattle grazing a species-rich mountain pasture under different stocking rates on the dynamics of diet selection and sward structure.
    Dumont B; Garel JP; Ginane C; Decuq F; Farruggia A; Pradel P; Rigolot C; Petit M
    Animal; 2007 Aug; 1(7):1042-52. PubMed ID: 22444807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixed-species grazing management to improve sustainability and biodiversity.
    Fraser MD; Rosa García R
    Rev Sci Tech; 2018 Apr; 37(1):247-257. PubMed ID: 30209414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of protein supplementation on forage utilization by cattle in annual grass-dominated rangelands in the Channeled Scablands of eastern Washington.
    Stonecipher CA; Panter KE; Villalba JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jun; 94(6):2572-82. PubMed ID: 27285933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harvester ant response to spatial and temporal heterogeneity in seed availability: pattern in the process of granivory.
    Wilby A; Shachak M
    Oecologia; 2000 Dec; 125(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 28547219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of facilitation and competition on group foraging in patches.
    Laguë M; Tania N; Heath J; Edelstein-Keshet L
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Oct; 310():88-96. PubMed ID: 22743132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of long-term grazing disturbance on the belowground storage of organic carbon in the Patagonian Monte, Argentina.
    Larreguy C; Carrera AL; Bertiller MB
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Feb; 134():47-55. PubMed ID: 24463848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grazing in heterogeneous environments: infra- and supra-parasite distributions determine herbivore grazing decisions.
    Hutchings MR; Gordon IJ; Kyriazakis I; Robertson E; Jackson F
    Oecologia; 2002 Aug; 132(3):453-460. PubMed ID: 28547424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What attracts elk onto cattle pasture? Implications for inter-species disease transmission.
    Pruvot M; Seidel D; Boyce MS; Musiani M; Massolo A; Kutz S; Orsel K
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Nov; 117(2):326-39. PubMed ID: 25218913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Video recording and vegetation classification elucidate sheep foraging ecology in species-rich grassland.
    Hall SJG; Arney DR; Bunce RGH; Vollmer E
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(21):14873-14887. PubMed ID: 34765147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maintaining social cohesion is a more important determinant of patch residence time than maximizing food intake rate in a group-living primate, Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata).
    Kazahari N
    Primates; 2014 Apr; 55(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 24515524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grazing sericea lespedeza for control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs.
    Burke JM; Miller JE; Mosjidis JA; Terrill TH
    Vet Parasitol; 2012 May; 186(3-4):507-12. PubMed ID: 22226762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cattle preferences differ when endophyte-infected tall fescue, birdsfoot trefoil, and alfalfa are grazed in different sequences.
    Lyman TD; Provenza FD; Villalba JJ; Wiedmeier RD
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Apr; 89(4):1131-7. PubMed ID: 21057090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of scale of patchiness for selectivity in grazing herbivores.
    WallisDeVries MF; Laca EA; Demment MW
    Oecologia; 1999 Nov; 121(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28308324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer.
    Shipley LA; Spalinger DE
    Oecologia; 1995 Sep; 104(1):112-121. PubMed ID: 28306920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.