These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12544216)

  • 1. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: infancy through adolescence.
    Jahanbin A; Rashed R; Yazdani R; Shahri NM; Kianifar H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):941-5. PubMed ID: 23714916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women.
    Budai M; Farkas LG; Tompson B; Katic M; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):154-61; discussion 162-3. PubMed ID: 12621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface anatomy of the face in Down's syndrome: age-related changes of anthropometric proportion indices in the craniofacial regions.
    Farkas LG; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 May; 13(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 12040203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
    Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive and normal adolescent boys and girls.
    Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Grandi G; Tartaglia GM; Ferrario VF
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):799-807. PubMed ID: 18298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Growth patterns of the face: a morphometric study.
    Farkas LG; Posnick JC; Hreczko TM
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jul; 29(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 1643058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The craniofacial morphology of bruxers versus nonbruxers.
    Young DV; Rinchuse DJ; Pierce CJ; Zullo T
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10022179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Agreement between cranial and facial classification through clinical observation and anthropometric measurement among Envigado school children.
    Torres-Restrepo AM; Quintero-Monsalve AM; Giraldo-Mira JF; Rueda ZV; Vélez-Trujillo N; Botero-Mariaca P
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():50. PubMed ID: 24886038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geography of the nose: a morphometric study.
    Farkas LG; Kolar JC; Munro IR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1986; 10(4):191-223. PubMed ID: 3812136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial morphology in prematurely born children.
    Paulsson L; Bondemark L
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 19216598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender-confirming facial surgery: considerations on the masculinity and femininity of faces.
    Hage JJ; Becking AG; de Graaf FH; Tuinzing DB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jun; 99(7):1799-807. PubMed ID: 9180702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population.
    Kanchan T; Krishan K; Gupta A; Acharya J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1645-9. PubMed ID: 25162547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.