These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12544216)

  • 21. Cross-sectional growth changes in skeletal and soft tissue cephalometric landmarks of children.
    Inada E; Saitoh I; Hayasaki H; Yamada C; Iwase Y; Takemoto Y; Matsumoto Y; Yamasaki Y
    Cranio; 2008 Jul; 26(3):170-81. PubMed ID: 18686493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging.
    Wirthlin J; Kau CH; English JD; Pan F; Zhou H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 23623784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facial anthropometry in newborns in Pondicherry.
    Shah M; Verma IC; Mahadevan S; Puri RK
    Indian J Pediatr; 1991; 58(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 1879908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Describing normal variations of head and face by using standard measurement and craniofacial variability index (CVI) in seven-year-old normal children.
    Ozdemir MB; Ilgaz A; Dilek A; Ayten H; Esat A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):470-4. PubMed ID: 17538305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anthropometric guidelines in cranio-orbital surgery.
    Farkas LG; Kolar JC
    Clin Plast Surg; 1987 Jan; 14(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 3816026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
    Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Basilar multiplane cephalometric analysis.
    Grayson BH; LaBatto FA; Kolber AB; McCarthy JG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Dec; 88(6):503-16. PubMed ID: 3865536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Esthetic analysis of the cervicofacial region.
    Zweig BE
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2000 Sep; 8(2):1-11. PubMed ID: 11212552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surface anatomy of the face in Down's syndrome: anthropometric proportion indices in the craniofacial regions.
    Farkas LG; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Nov; 12(6):519-24; discussion 525-6. PubMed ID: 11711817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Soft tissue profile in white Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Scavone H; Zahn-Silva W; do Valle-Corotti KM; Nahás AC
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 18193966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A method of deriving subgroups of a population: a study of craniofacial taxonomy.
    Hirschfeld WJ; Moyers RE; Enlow DH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1973 Sep; 39(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 4750676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel methods for quantifying soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery.
    Guest E; Berry E; Morris D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 30(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 11829229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Craniofacial disproportions in Apert's syndrome: an anthropometric study.
    Farkas LG; Kolar JC; Munro IR
    Cleft Palate J; 1985 Oct; 22(4):253-65. PubMed ID: 3863723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part II. Normal values and growth trends.
    Waitzman AA; Posnick JC; Armstrong DC; Pron GE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 1571345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races.
    Farkas LG; Katic MJ; Forrest CR; Alt KW; Bagic I; Baltadjiev G; Cunha E; Cvicelová M; Davies S; Erasmus I; Gillett-Netting R; Hajnis K; Kemkes-Grottenthaler A; Khomyakova I; Kumi A; Kgamphe JS; Kayo-daigo N; Le T; Malinowski A; Negasheva M; Manolis S; Ogetürk M; Parvizrad R; Rösing F; Sahu P; Sforza C; Sivkov S; Sultanova N; Tomazo-Ravnik T; Tóth G; Uzun A; Yahia E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):615-46. PubMed ID: 16077306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study.
    Ha Y; Park YS; Lee SP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 24880851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.