136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12544934)
1. Oblique reformation in cervical spine computed tomography: a new look at an old friend.
Roberts CC; McDaniel NT; Krupinski EA; Erly WK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jan; 28(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 12544934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of oblique magnetic resonance images for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis.
Park MS; Moon SH; Lee HM; Kim TH; Oh JK; Lee SY; Oh JB; Riew KD
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 25452016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of MRI grading for cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on axial and oblique sagittal images: Concordance and reliability study.
Kim W; Ahn KS; Kang CH; Kang WY; Yang KS
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():165-169. PubMed ID: 28334616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee SY; Park NH; Chung EC; Rho MH; Kwon HJ; Kook SH
Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120515. PubMed ID: 23410800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for grading cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Han CH; Lee SY; Chung EC; Kim MS; Kwon HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 25055278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing Foraminal Stenosis in the Cervical Spine: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Surface Reconstruction to Two-Dimensional Modalities.
Schell A; Rhee JM; Holbrook J; Lenehan E; Park KY
Global Spine J; 2017 May; 7(3):266-271. PubMed ID: 28660110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of osseous cervical foraminal stenosis in spinal radiculopathy using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Engel G; Bender YY; Adams LC; Boker SM; Fahlenkamp UL; Wagner M; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 30324384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI for identifying the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis in cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study.
Douglas-Akinwande AC; Rydberg J; Shah MV; Phillips MD; Caldemeyer KS; Lurito JT; Ying J; Mathews VP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 20028905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Cervical Foraminal Stenosis from Oblique Radiograph Using Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm.
Kim J; Yang JJ; Song J; Jo S; Kim Y; Park J; Lee JB; Lee GW; Park S
Yonsei Med J; 2024 Jul; 65(7):389-396. PubMed ID: 38910301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical foraminal stenosis: comparison of 3D T2 SPACE with sagittal oblique 2D T2 TSE.
Barnaure I; Galley J; Fritz B; Sutter R
Skeletal Radiol; 2022 Jul; 51(7):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 35006279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two MR grading systems for correlation between grade of cervical neural foraminal stenosis and clinical manifestations.
Lee KH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Rho MH; Shin H; Kwon YJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150971. PubMed ID: 27007709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphologic changes in the cervical neural foramen due to flexion and extension: in vivo imaging study.
Kitagawa T; Fujiwara A; Kobayashi N; Saiki K; Tamai K; Saotome K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2821-5. PubMed ID: 15599285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of cervical foraminal stenosis using dynamic flexion-extension computed tomography images.
Mizouchi T; Katsumi K; Izumi T; Yamazaki A; Shoji H; Tashi H; Ohashi M; Hirano T; Endo N; Watanabe K
J Orthop Sci; 2020 Sep; 25(5):805-811. PubMed ID: 31831318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interreader Reliability and Clinical Validity of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis.
Lee JE; Park HJ; Lee SY; Lee YT; Kim YB; Lee KH; Shin H; Kwon YJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(6):926-930. PubMed ID: 28481805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of noncontrast computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy.
Martin-Vaquero P; da Costa RC; Drost WT
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2014; 55(5):496-505. PubMed ID: 24547789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical usefulness of CT-myelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool?
Song KJ; Choi BW; Kim GH; Kim JR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 19525791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of Oblique Sagittal Reformatted and Three-dimensional Surface Reconstruction Computed Tomography in Foraminal Stenosis Decompression.
Oshina M; Oshima Y; Tanaka S; Tan LA; Li XJ; Tuchman A; Riew KD
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):16011. PubMed ID: 30375504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of computed tomography in prediction of operability of L5/S1 foraminal stenosis using region of interest: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.
Shim DW; Lee BH; Seo J; Hong H; Shin SC; Kim HS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(42):e17422. PubMed ID: 31626098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oblique Sagittal Images Prevent Underestimation of the Neuroforaminal Stenosis Grade Caused by Disc Herniation in Cervical Spine MRI.
Kintzelé L; Rehnitz C; Kauczor HU; Weber MA
Rofo; 2018 Oct; 190(10):946-954. PubMed ID: 29874691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Prevalence of Cervical Foraminal Stenosis on Computed Tomography of a Selected Community-Based Korean Population.
Ko S; Choi W; Lee J
Clin Orthop Surg; 2018 Dec; 10(4):433-438. PubMed ID: 30505411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
