BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12544947)

  • 1. Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.
    Hitchon PW; Brenton MD; Coppes JK; From AM; Torner JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jan; 28(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 12544947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
    Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
    Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
    Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF CERVICAL SCREWS TAPPING AND DESIGN.
    Silva P; Rosa RC; Shimano AC; Albuquerque de Paula FJ; Volpon JB; Aparecido Defino HL
    Rev Bras Ortop; 2009 Jan; 44(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 27004189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of relationship of screw pullout strength, insertional torque, and bone mineral density in the cervical spine.
    Reitman CA; Nguyen L; Fogel GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2004 Aug; 17(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 15280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of the pullout strength of cervical screws.
    Conrad BP; Cordista AG; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Dec; 18(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 16306839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
    Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: a biomechanical comparison.
    Klekamp JW; Ugbo JL; Heller JG; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord; 2000 Dec; 13(6):515-8. PubMed ID: 11132983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insertion torque and pullout force of rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation in a fatigued initial pilot hole.
    Pitzen T; Franta F; Barbier D; Steudel WI
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 15347006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws.
    Ryken TC; Clausen JD; Traynelis VC; Goel VK
    J Neurosurg; 1995 Aug; 83(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 7616279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.
    Porto MA; Silva P; Rosa R; Volpon JB; Shimano AC; de Paula FJ; Defino HL
    Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21(5):956-63. PubMed ID: 22173611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.
    Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Turner JL; Crandall DG; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 23602373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screw fixation to the posterior cortical shell does not influence peak torque and pullout in anterior cervical plating.
    Pitzen T; Barbier D; Tintinger F; Steudel WI; Strowitzki M
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 12384759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Considerations for the use of C7 crossing laminar screws in subaxial and cervicothoracic instrumentation.
    Ilgenfritz RM; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):E199-204. PubMed ID: 23169075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cutting flute design on cortical bone screw insertion torque and pullout strength.
    Yerby S; Scott CC; Evans NJ; Messing KL; Carter DR
    J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 11265014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of loading history on the cervical screw pullout strength value.
    Pezowicz C; Filipiak J
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2009; 11(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 20131748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of screw length and bone cement augmentation on the fixation strength of iliac screws: a biomechanical study.
    Zheng ZM; Zhang KB; Zhang JF; Yu BS; Liu H; Zhuang XM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):545-50. PubMed ID: 19956027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws.
    Pfeiffer M; Gilbertson LG; Goel VK; Griss P; Keller JC; Ryken TC; Hoffman HE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 May; 21(9):1037-44. PubMed ID: 8724087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior vertebral body screw pullout testing. A comparison of Zeilke, Kaneda, Universal Spine System, and Universal Spine System with pullout-resistant nut.
    Lieberman IH; Khazim R; Woodside T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(8):908-10. PubMed ID: 9580958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of cemented rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation.
    Pitzen TR; Drumm J; Bruchmann B; Barbier DD; Steudel WI
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Jan; 4(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16506467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.