241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12545918)
1. 2004 decision process model approved for development.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Jan; 23(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 12545918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Accreditation timeline charts transition from old process to new model.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Jan; 23(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12545917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 2004 aggregation and decision rules approved for all programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Aug; 23(8):1, 3-6. PubMed ID: 12920779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Surveyors looking for well-designed processes.
Spath P
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):162, 167, 158. PubMed ID: 11188108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Information management central to JCAHO surveys.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):161-2, 157-8. PubMed ID: 11188107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Update: clarification process and periodic performance review process.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Nov; 27(11):7. PubMed ID: 18290304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical revision of survey process may ease compliance burden.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 Nov; 27(11):149-51. PubMed ID: 12416364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Key aspects of a recent Joint Commission survey. Surveyors focused on staff knowledge, patient care.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):110-1. PubMed ID: 15338824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Aid survey preparation with management principles.
Swain P
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):168-70, 158. PubMed ID: 11188111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. You'll soon need to update your PPR every year.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Dec; 29(12):172-4. PubMed ID: 15597908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Take time to prepare, include others in survey preparation.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2002 Nov; 27(11):155. PubMed ID: 12416367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clearing the hurdles to decision support.
Schuerenberg BK
Health Data Manag; 2003 May; 11(5):42-6, 48. PubMed ID: 12762282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is your accreditation at the mercy of a surveyors' mood or agenda?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Dec; 23(12):213-6. PubMed ID: 10187256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The state of continuous survey readiness: is your facility ready for callers?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):157-61. PubMed ID: 11188106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital survey process changes in 2000.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11009951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New accreditation process model for 1994 and beyond.
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Jun; 50(6):1111-2, 1121. PubMed ID: 8517444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Eyeing the watchdog.
Morrissey J
Mod Healthc; 2002 Apr; 32(16):8-9. PubMed ID: 12001570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Joint Commission veers from hard-line approach.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Mar; 25(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 11184089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unannounced surveys don't require QI changes.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Feb; 13(2):19-21. PubMed ID: 16544558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survey-weary hospitals drop JCAHO accreditation, others may follow.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1995 Feb; 20(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10153179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
