607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12545976)
1. Advance directives: an overview of changing right-to-die laws.
Fade AE
J Nurs Law; 1995; 2(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 12545976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A time to live, a time to die.
Stiefel LS
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future.
Gieszl HC; Velasco PA
Ariz State Law J; 1992; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Redrafting Ohio's advance directive laws.
Martyn SR; Reagan JE; Minogue B; Dippel DL; Schimer MR; Taraszewski R
Akron Law Rev; 1992; 26(2):229-92. PubMed ID: 16506326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
Caffera SM
Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
Calder M
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. End-of-life decision making: what we don't know, we make up; what we do know, we ignore.
Johnson SH
Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(1):13-47. PubMed ID: 12199229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
Horttor BJ
N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deja vu all over again: the false dichotomy between sanctity of life and quality of life.
Cantor NL
Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 17099994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal issues in end-of-life care in Oklahoma.
Cross LL
Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2002; 27(3):921-37. PubMed ID: 15478256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Advance directives--current trends and developments.
Kramer RL
NAHAM Manage J; 1995; 22(1):17, 35. PubMed ID: 10143986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changing attitudes in Florida's 'right to die' law.
Grimes GK
Stetson Law Rev; 1985; 14(2):375-95. PubMed ID: 16100801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An Oklahoma perspective: end of life decision-making and termination of treatment.
Burkett TM; Weyrauch S
Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):565-81. PubMed ID: 16273679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "She don't want no life support." A summary of Osgood and other developments in Michigan since Martin.
Broder AJ
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):595-605. PubMed ID: 12627574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Advance directives for psychiatric care: a theoretical and practical overview for legal professionals.
Gallagher EM
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):746-87. PubMed ID: 12807098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. State legislatures become beehives of right-to-die statutes.
Hosp Ethics; 1991; 7(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 10111507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adding constitutional depravation to untimely death: South Dakota's living will pregnancy provision.
Matchan HE; Sheffield KE
S D Law Rev; 1992; 37(2):388-412. PubMed ID: 16086521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advance directives: keeping up with changing legislation.
Fade AE
Todays OR Nurse; 1994; 16(4):23-6. PubMed ID: 8066588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
