330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12546011)
1. What medical school did you graduate from? Judicial prescribing of medical treatments.
Miller RD
J Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 12546011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
Klein DW
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
Leong GB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.
Saks ER
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 47(3):689-761. PubMed ID: 16617526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
Davoli JI
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Queensland's Mental Health Court: the first 12 months.
Lawrence JM
Health Law Can; 2004 Apr; 24(3):47-59. PubMed ID: 15192939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
Hilgers K; Ramer P
Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a pure best interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients.
McCubbin M; Weisstub DN
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 9526712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
Gutierrez L
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicate-to-execute: current trends in death penalty jurisprudence and the perils of dual loyalty.
Shaivitz DS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(1):149-74. PubMed ID: 15468506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Competency to refuse lifesaving treatment: valuing the nonlogical aspects of a person's decisions.
Snyder AC
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):299-320. PubMed ID: 7829306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Civil commitment in Wisconsin: the impact of Lessard v. Schmidt.
Zander TK
Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(2):503-62. PubMed ID: 11664748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Consequences of involuntary treatment.
Hassenfeld IN
Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 155(3):450-1. PubMed ID: 9501768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
Marshall GS
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):167-92. PubMed ID: 16998979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Jones v. Gerhardstein: the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs.
Ledwith DM
Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(5):1367-98. PubMed ID: 16047454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
Hensl KB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
