These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12546017)

  • 1. A law school forum on human cell-lines and frozen embryos.
    Orsi MP
    Linacre Q; 2001 May; 68(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 12546017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.
    Biagi KG
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1991; 35(2):433-62. PubMed ID: 16144099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [To kill or to donate orphan human embryos].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Apr; 5(200):923. PubMed ID: 19438097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    LoBiondo AR
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():277-305. PubMed ID: 16281328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond Moore: issues of law and policy impacting human cell and genetic research in the age of biotechnology.
    Hartman RG
    J Leg Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):463-77. PubMed ID: 7779167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To dispose or not to dispose: questioning the fate of preembryos after a divorce in J.B. v. M.B.
    Issa F
    Houst Law Rev; 2003; 39(5):1549-90. PubMed ID: 15212012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The legal status of in vitro embryos.
    Dickens BM; Cook RJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Oct; 111(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 20705291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos.
    Langley LS; Blackston JW
    J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.
    Mortimer D
    Monash Univ Law Rev; 1993; 19(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 17333577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Living tissue and organ donors and property law: more on Moore.
    Dickens BM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():73-93. PubMed ID: 10183665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Prenatal adoption": the Vatican's proposal to the in vitro fertilization disposition dilemma.
    Puskar JM
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1998; 14(3):757-93. PubMed ID: 12568085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro embryos and DNA profiling: far from clear legal reform.
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):15-27. PubMed ID: 15032096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
    Trespalacios MJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disposition of cryopreserved preembryos after divorce.
    Windsor KH
    Iowa Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 88(4):1001-34. PubMed ID: 15214352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Massachusetts case is latest to ask court to decide fate of frozen embryos.
    Goldberg C
    N Y Times Web; 1999 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11647732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
    Fleming NA
    Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What are the ownership rights for gametes and embryos? Advance directives and the disposition of cryopreserved gametes and embryos.
    Pennings G
    Hum Reprod; 2000 May; 15(5):979-86. PubMed ID: 10783338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Catholic teaching on the human embryo as an object of research.
    Shea JB
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2006; 6(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 17037496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.