190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12546106)
1. Histological evaluation of 4 cases of root coverage following a connective tissue graft combined with an enamel matrix derivative preparation.
Carnio J; Camargo PM; Kenney EB; Schenk RK
J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1534-43. PubMed ID: 12546106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation.
McGuire MK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14514225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Connective tissue-bone onlay graft with enamel matrix derivative for treatment of gingival recession: a case report.
Nozawa T; Sugiyama T; Satoh T; Tanaka K; Enomoto H; Ito K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12516827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periodontal regeneration with a combination of enamel matrix proteins and autogenous bone grafting.
Cochran DL; Jones A; Heijl L; Mellonig JT; Schoolfield J; King GN
J Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1269-81. PubMed ID: 14584859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Root coverage technique with enamel matrix derivative.
Moriyama T; Matsumoto S; Makiishi T
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2009 May; 50(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19815997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up.
Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Torsello F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e10-20. PubMed ID: 22254230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation.
Pilloni A; Paolantonio M; Camargo PM
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2031-9. PubMed ID: 17209788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human histologic evaluation of root coverage obtained with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft. A case report.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 1999 Jul; 70(7):813-21. PubMed ID: 10440645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: clinical case reports and histologic evaluation.
Roman A; Câmpian R; Domşa I; Soancă A; Gocan H
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2010; 51(4):793-7. PubMed ID: 21103645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.
Bittencourt S; Ribeiro Edel P; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of multiple areas of gingival recession using a simple harvesting technique for autogenous connective tissue graft.
McLeod DE; Reyes E; Branch-Mays G
J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1680-7. PubMed ID: 19792859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histology of connective tissue graft. A case report.
Majzoub Z; Landi L; Grusovin MG; Cordioli G
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1607-15. PubMed ID: 11759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic evaluation of periodontal healing in humans following regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative. A 10-case series.
Yukna RA; Mellonig JT
J Periodontol; 2000 May; 71(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 10872956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
