These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1254612)

  • 21. Bone-implant interface and remaining tissues on the implant surface after push-out test: an SEM observation.
    Li J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 9622105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface.
    Davies JE
    Anat Rec; 1996 Jun; 245(2):426-45. PubMed ID: 8769677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interaction of osteogenic cells with hydroxylapatite implant materials in vitro and in vivo.
    Bagambisa FB; Joos U; Schilli W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 2098325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Problem of bone-biomaterial interface].
    Muster D; Champy M
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1978 Mar; (121):109-24. PubMed ID: 685744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Biomechanic and histomorphometric studies of HIP titanium glass ceramic, a new implant material, compared with glass ceramics, titanium and titanium alloy].
    Schmitz HJ; Fritz TR; Fuhrmann G; Gross U; Strunz V
    Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1990; 14(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 2102405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Mechanically processable bioactive glass ceramics--a new biomaterial for bone replacement. 1].
    Gummel J; Höland W; Naumann K; Vogel W
    Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1983; 16(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 6666190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ultrastructural in vitro characterization of a porous hydroxyapatite/bone cell interface.
    Holden CM; Bernard GW
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 1963643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experimental implantation of porous materials into bone. Proplast for low modulus fixation of prostheses.
    Rhinelander FW; Nelson CL
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1974; 40(5-6):771-98. PubMed ID: 4620054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surface analysis and effects on interfacial bone microhardness of collagen-coated titanium implants: a rabbit model.
    Morra M; Cassinelli C; Meda L; Fini M; Giavaresi G; Giardino R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 15747670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Morphology of osteogenesis in bioactive glass interface.
    Aho AJ; Heikkilä J; Aho HJ; Andersson O; Yli-Urpo A
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1993; 207():145-53. PubMed ID: 8154829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.
    Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Piezoelectric ceramic implants: a feasibility study.
    Park JB; von Recum AF; Kenner GH; Kelly BJ; Coffeen WW; Grether MF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 7364789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro osteogenesis on a highly bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate).
    Moura J; Teixeira LN; Ravagnani C; Peitl O; Zanotto ED; Beloti MM; Panzeri H; Rosa AL; de Oliveira PT
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Sep; 82(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 17311315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model.
    Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle.
    Hench LL; Paschall HA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1973; 7(3):25-42. PubMed ID: 4123968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Selected light microscopy and polarization optical studies of implant-bone interfaces].
    Drechsler C; Radestock J; Köhler S; Staudt J
    Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1983; 16(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 6666189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Bando Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Nov; 26(11):1419-32. PubMed ID: 1447227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of glass-ceramic bone implant materials on the in vitro formation of hydroxyapatite.
    Blumenthal NC; Posner AS; Cosma V; Gross U
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Nov; 22(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 2853711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Histochemical responses at a biomaterial's interface.
    Hench LL; Paschall HA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1974; 8(3):49-64. PubMed ID: 4616964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the soft tissue interface at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experimental study on rabbits.
    Ungersböck A; Pohler O; Perren SM
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 7950879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.