BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12546565)

  • 1. 3D-QSAR and receptor modeling of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with flexible atom receptor model (FLARM).
    Peng T; Pei J; Zhou J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(1):298-303. PubMed ID: 12546565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pseudoreceptor models and 3D-QSAR for imidazobenzodiazepines at GABA A/BzR subtypes alphaxbeta3gamma2 [x = 1-3, 5, and 6] via flexible atom receptor model.
    Lu A; Zhou J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):1130-6. PubMed ID: 15154782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elucidating inhibitory models of the inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor by docking and 3D-QSAR.
    Chen G; Luo X; Zhu W; Luo C; Liu H; Puah CM; Chen K; Jiang H
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2004 May; 12(9):2409-17. PubMed ID: 15080937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the quality of 3D-QSAR by using flexible-ligand receptor models.
    Pei J; Chen H; Liu Z; Han X; Wang Q; Shen B; Zhou J; Lai L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1920-33. PubMed ID: 16309299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Receptor-guided alignment-based comparative 3D-QSAR studies of benzylidene malonitrile tyrphostins as EGFR and HER-2 kinase inhibitors.
    Kamath S; Buolamwini JK
    J Med Chem; 2003 Oct; 46(22):4657-68. PubMed ID: 14561085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards predictive inhibitor design for the EGFR autophosphorylation activity.
    San Juan AA
    Eur J Med Chem; 2008 Apr; 43(4):781-91. PubMed ID: 17689836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rational design and 3D-pharmacophore mapping of 5'-thiourea-substituted alpha-thymidine analogues as mycobacterial TMPK inhibitors.
    Andrade CH; Pasqualoto KF; Ferreira EI; Hopfinger AJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1070-8. PubMed ID: 19296716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 4D-QSAR analysis of a series of antifungal p450 inhibitors and 3D-pharmacophore comparisons as a function of alignment.
    Liu J; Pan D; Tseng Y; Hopfinger AJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(6):2170-9. PubMed ID: 14632469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structure-based approach to pharmacophore identification, in silico screening, and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies for inhibitors of Trypanosoma cruzi dihydrofolate reductase function.
    Schormann N; Senkovich O; Walker K; Wright DL; Anderson AC; Rosowsky A; Ananthan S; Shinkre B; Velu S; Chattopadhyay D
    Proteins; 2008 Dec; 73(4):889-901. PubMed ID: 18536013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative structure-based design: formalism and application of receptor-dependent RD-4D-QSAR analysis to a set of glucose analogue inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase.
    Pan D; Tseng Y; Hopfinger AJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1591-607. PubMed ID: 14502494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D QSAR studies on protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors: comparison of the quality and predictivity among 3D QSAR models obtained from different conformer-based alignments.
    Pandey G; Saxena AK
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2579-90. PubMed ID: 17125198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of the novel molecular alignment method using the Hopfield Neural Network to 3D-QSAR.
    Arakawa M; Hasegawa K; Funatsu K
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1396-402. PubMed ID: 14502472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binding interaction analysis of the active site and its inhibitors for neuraminidase (N1 subtype) of human influenza virus by the integration of molecular docking, FMO calculation and 3D-QSAR CoMFA modeling.
    Zhang Q; Yang J; Liang K; Feng L; Li S; Wan J; Xu X; Yang G; Liu D; Yang S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1802-12. PubMed ID: 18707092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D-QSAR with the aid of pharmacophore search and docking-based alignments for farnesyltransferase inhibitors.
    Vaidya M; Weigt M; Wiese M
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Oct; 44(10):4070-82. PubMed ID: 19515462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling ligand-receptor interaction for some MHC class II HLA-DR4 peptide mimetic inhibitors using several molecular docking and 3D QSAR techniques.
    Wei HY; Tsai KC; Lin TH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1343-51. PubMed ID: 16180911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharmacophore modeling and in silico screening for new KDR kinase inhibitors.
    Yu H; Wang Z; Zhang L; Zhang J; Huang Q
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2007 Apr; 17(8):2126-33. PubMed ID: 17306530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a pharmacophore model for the design of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors: isoflavones and 3-phenyl-4(1H)-quinolones.
    Traxler P; Green J; Mett H; Séquin U; Furet P
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 10090785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multitemplate alignment method for the development of a reliable 3D-QSAR model for the analysis of MMP3 inhibitors.
    Tuccinardi T; Ortore G; Santos MA; Marques SM; Nuti E; Rossello A; Martinelli A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1715-24. PubMed ID: 19522467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular docking and 3D QSAR studies on 1-amino-2-phenyl-4-(piperidin-1-yl)-butanes based on the structural modeling of human CCR5 receptor.
    Xu Y; Liu H; Niu C; Luo C; Luo X; Shen J; Chen K; Jiang H
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 12(23):6193-208. PubMed ID: 15519163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined 3D-QSAR modeling and molecular docking study on indolinone derivatives as inhibitors of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1.
    AbdulHameed MD; Hamza A; Liu J; Zhan CG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1760-72. PubMed ID: 18717540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.