369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12547369)
1. Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur.
Wirtz DC; Pandorf T; Portheine F; Radermacher K; Schiffers N; Prescher A; Weichert D; Niethard FU
J Biomech; 2003 Feb; 36(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 12547369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses.
Baca V; Horak Z; Mikulenka P; Dzupa V
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Sep; 30(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 18243761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur.
Wirtz DC; Schiffers N; Pandorf T; Radermacher K; Weichert D; Forst R
J Biomech; 2000 Oct; 33(10):1325-30. PubMed ID: 10899344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; Cataldi M; Taddei F; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(14):2356-62. PubMed ID: 23972430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orthotropic bone remodelling around uncemented femoral implant: a comparison with isotropic formulation.
Mathai B; Dhara S; Gupta S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):1115-1134. PubMed ID: 33768358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis.
Taylor WR; Roland E; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Klabunde R; Warner MD; Hobatho MC; Rakotomanana L; Clift SE
J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 12020996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy from stress tensors.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jan; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24777672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.
Yosibash Z; Tal D; Trabelsi N
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2707-23. PubMed ID: 20439270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mapping anisotropy of the proximal femur for enhanced image based finite element analysis.
Enns-Bray WS; Owoc JS; Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3272-8. PubMed ID: 25219361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new approach to determine the accuracy of morphology-elasticity relationships in continuum FE analyses of human proximal femur.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
J Biomech; 2012 Nov; 45(16):2884-92. PubMed ID: 23017379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
Yosibash Z; Padan R; Joskowicz L; Milgrom C
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 17536896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions.
Peng L; Bai J; Zeng X; Zhou Y
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16076560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-specific finite-element analyses of the proximal femur with orthotropic material properties validated by experiments.
Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jun; 133(6):061001. PubMed ID: 21744921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated segmentation of cortical and trabecular bone to generate finite element models for femoral bone mechanics.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Venäläinen MS; Matikka H; Zheng Y; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Aug; 70():19-28. PubMed ID: 31280927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image-based anatomical reconstruction and pharmaco-mediated bone remodeling model applied to a femur with subtrochanteric fracture: A subject-specific finite element study.
Bahia MT; Hecke MB; Mercuri EGF
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jul; 69():58-71. PubMed ID: 31171487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
