These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12547813)

  • 1. A prestressed cable network model of the adherent cell cytoskeleton.
    Coughlin MF; Stamenović D
    Biophys J; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Pt 1):1328-36. PubMed ID: 12547813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of prestress and architecture of the cytoskeleton and deformability of cytoskeletal filaments in mechanics of adherent cells: a quantitative analysis.
    Stamenović D; Coughlin MF
    J Theor Biol; 1999 Nov; 201(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 10534436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A finite element model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting.
    Mijailovich SM; Kojic M; Zivkovic M; Fabry B; Fredberg JJ
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2002 Oct; 93(4):1429-36. PubMed ID: 12235044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computation of adherent cell elasticity for critical cell-bead geometry in magnetic twisting experiments.
    Ohayon J; Tracqui P
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 33(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15771267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissecting the contribution of actin and vimentin intermediate filaments to mechanical phenotype of suspended cells using high-throughput deformability measurements and computational modeling.
    Gladilin E; Gonzalez P; Eils R
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2598-605. PubMed ID: 24952458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell.
    McGarry JG; Prendergast PJ
    Eur Cell Mater; 2004 Apr; 7():27-33; discussion 33-4. PubMed ID: 15095253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry.
    Bausch AR; Ziemann F; Boulbitch AA; Jacobson K; Sackmann E
    Biophys J; 1998 Oct; 75(4):2038-49. PubMed ID: 9746546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computational tensegrity model predicts dynamic rheological behaviors in living cells.
    Sultan C; Stamenović D; Ingber DE
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 32(4):520-30. PubMed ID: 15117025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of nonlinear responses of adherent epithelial cells probed by magnetic bead twisting: A finite element model based on a homogenization approach.
    Ohayon J; Tracqui P; Fodil R; Féréol S; Laurent VM; Planus E; Isabey D
    J Biomech Eng; 2004 Dec; 126(6):685-98. PubMed ID: 15796327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Viscoelasticity of cross-linked actin networks: experimental tests, mechanical modeling and finite-element analysis.
    Unterberger MJ; Schmoller KM; Wurm C; Bausch AR; Holzapfel GA
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Jul; 9(7):7343-53. PubMed ID: 23523535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Models of cytoskeletal mechanics of adherent cells.
    Stamenović D; Ingber DE
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2002 Jun; 1(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 14586710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interrelations between elastic energy and strain in a tensegrity model: contribution to the analysis of the mechanical response in living cells.
    Wendling S; CaNadas P; Oddou C; Meunier A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Feb; 5(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12186729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of cell Young's modulus of adherent cells probed by optical and magnetic tweezers: influence of cell thickness and bead immersion.
    Kamgoué A; Ohayon J; Tracqui P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 17655473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new approach to model cross-linked actin networks: multi-scale continuum formulation and computational analysis.
    Unterberger MJ; Schmoller KM; Bausch AR; Holzapfel GA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Jun; 22():95-114. PubMed ID: 23601624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partitioning of cortical and deep cytoskeleton responses from transient magnetic bead twisting.
    Laurent VM; Fodil R; Cañadas P; Féréol S; Louis B; Planus E; Isabey D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Nov; 31(10):1263-78. PubMed ID: 14649500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells?
    Pourati J; Maniotis A; Spiegel D; Schaffer JL; Butler JP; Fredberg JJ; Ingber DE; Stamenovic D; Wang N
    Am J Physiol; 1998 May; 274(5):C1283-9. PubMed ID: 9612215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tensegrity behaviour of cortical and cytosolic cytoskeletal components in twisted living adherent cells.
    Laurent VM; Cañadas P; Fodil R; Planus E; Asnacios A; Wendling S; Isabey D
    Acta Biotheor; 2002; 50(4):331-56. PubMed ID: 12675535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative model of cellular elasticity based on tensegrity.
    Stamenović D; Coughlin MF
    J Biomech Eng; 2000 Feb; 122(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 10790828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of spreading and contractility on cell detachment.
    Dowling EP; McGarry JP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2014 May; 42(5):1037-48. PubMed ID: 24356853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of prestressed semiflexible polymer chains as a model of cell rheology.
    Rosenblatt N; Alencar AM; Majumdar A; Suki B; Stamenović D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Oct; 97(16):168101. PubMed ID: 17155438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.