101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12547950)
1. Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open colposuspension.
Cheon WC; Mak JH; Liu JY
Hong Kong Med J; 2003 Feb; 9(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12547950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
Carey MP; Goh JT; Rosamilia A; Cornish A; Gordon I; Hawthorne G; Maher CF; Dwyer PL; Moran P; Gilmour DT
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16956331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Kitchener HC; Dunn G; Lawton V; Reid F; Nelson L; Smith AR;
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1007-13. PubMed ID: 16956332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Ankardal M; Ekerydh A; Crafoord K; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 15327613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
Dean NM; Ellis G; Wilson PD; Herbison GP
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD002239. PubMed ID: 16855989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
Moehrer B; Ellis G; Carey M; Wilson PD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD002239. PubMed ID: 11869634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic colposuspension: a systematic review.
Moehrer B; Carey M; Wilson D
BJOG; 2003 Mar; 110(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 12628259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence.
Dumville JC; Manca A; Kitchener HC; Smith AR; Nelson L; Torgerson DJ;
BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16956333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence.
Valpas A; Kivelä A; Penttinen J; Kujansuu E; Haarala M; Nilsson CG
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 15228999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: results of a prospective controlled study.
el-Toukhy TA; Davies AE
BJU Int; 2001 Sep; 88(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 11564022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?
Reid F; Smith AR
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 17625416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Ankardal M; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):773-9. PubMed ID: 16026404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open compared with laparoscopic approach to Burch colposuspension: a cost analysis.
Kohli N; Jacobs PA; Sze EH; Roat TW; Karram MM
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 90(3):411-5. PubMed ID: 9277654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic morphological changes in the anterior vaginal wall before and after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in primary urodynamic stress incontinence.
Yang JM; Yang SH; Huang WC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15736202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up.
Ward KL; Hilton P;
BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 17970791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic colposuspension.
Lawton V; Smith AR
Semin Laparosc Surg; 1999 Jun; 6(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 10459061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Laparoscopic transperitoneal colposuspension modo Burch in stress incontinence in women. A comparison of early and late results].
Huk J; Fryczkowski M
Przegl Lek; 2002; 59(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12152257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up.
Alcalay M; Monga A; Stanton SL
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Sep; 102(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 7547767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why do women have voiding dysfunction and de novo detrusor instability after colposuspension?
Bombier L; Freeman RM; Perkins EP; Williams MP; Shaw SR
BJOG; 2002 Apr; 109(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 12013161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative outcome analysis of laparoscopic colposuspension, abdominal colposuspension and vaginal needle suspension for female urinary incontinence.
Das S
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):368-71. PubMed ID: 9679879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
