552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12548632)
1. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard.
Alban A; David SO; Bjorkesten L; Andersson C; Sloge E; Lewis S; Currie I
Proteomics; 2003 Jan; 3(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 12548632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Establishment of two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis using cerebrospinal fluid from neurocysticercosis patients].
Li JY; Tian XJ; Huang Y; Yang YJ; Ma QR; Xue YP
Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 19160961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Capabilities using 2-D DIGE in proteomics research : the new gold standard for 2-D gel electrophoresis.
Rozanas CR; Loyland SM
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 441():1-18. PubMed ID: 18370308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluorescent two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis unveils the potential of gel-based proteomics.
Van den Bergh G; Arckens L
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 15(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15102464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protein profiling of human postmortem brain using 2-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE).
Swatton JE; Prabakaran S; Karp NA; Lilley KS; Bahn S
Mol Psychiatry; 2004 Feb; 9(2):128-43. PubMed ID: 14708031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Difference gel electrophoresis based on lys/cys tagging.
Westermeier R; Scheibe B
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 424():73-85. PubMed ID: 18369854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of fibrosis-relevant proteins using DIGE (difference in gel electrophoresis) in different models of hepatic fibrosis.
Henkel C; Roderfeld M; Weiskirchen R; Scheibe B; Matern S; Roeb E
Z Gastroenterol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15650968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative proteomics for two-dimensional gels using difference gel electrophoresis.
Friedman DB
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 367():219-39. PubMed ID: 17185779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All about DIGE: quantification technology for differential-display 2D-gel proteomics.
Lilley KS; Friedman DB
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Dec; 1(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 15966837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three commercially available DIGE analysis software packages: minimal user intervention in gel-based proteomics.
Kang Y; Techanukul T; Mantalaris A; Nagy JM
J Proteome Res; 2009 Feb; 8(2):1077-84. PubMed ID: 19133722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a fluorescent internal protein standard to achieve quantitative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
Wheelock AM; Morin D; Bartosiewicz M; Buckpitt AR
Proteomics; 2006 Mar; 6(5):1385-98. PubMed ID: 16429456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2D-DIGE: comparative proteomics of cellular signalling pathways.
Larbi NB; Jefferies C
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 517():105-32. PubMed ID: 19378013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of difference in-gel electrophoresis for quantitation of protein expression.
Sapra R
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 492():93-112. PubMed ID: 19241028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal replication and the importance of experimental design for gel-based quantitative proteomics.
Hunt SM; Thomas MR; Sebastian LT; Pedersen SK; Harcourt RL; Sloane AJ; Wilkins MR
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(3):809-19. PubMed ID: 15952727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical analysis of the experimental variation in the proteomic characterization of human plasma by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis.
Corzett TH; Fodor IK; Choi MW; Walsworth VL; Chromy BA; Turteltaub KW; McCutchen-Maloney SL
J Proteome Res; 2006 Oct; 5(10):2611-9. PubMed ID: 17022632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis.
Viswanathan S; Unlü M; Minden JS
Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(3):1351-8. PubMed ID: 17406422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative experimental design with an applied normalization scheme can improve statistical power in 2D-DIGE experiments.
Engelen K; Sifrim A; Van de Plas B; Laukens K; Arckens L; Marchal K
J Proteome Res; 2010 Oct; 9(10):4919-26. PubMed ID: 20681517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of proteomics in cancer gene profiling: two-dimensional difference in gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE).
Hariharan D; Weeks ME; Crnogorac-Jurcevic T
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 576():197-211. PubMed ID: 19882264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results and reliability of protein quantification for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis strongly depend on the type of protein sample and the method employed.
Weist S; Eravci M; Broedel O; Fuxius S; Eravci S; Baumgartner A
Proteomics; 2008 Aug; 8(16):3389-96. PubMed ID: 18646011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proteomic analysis of redox- and ErbB2-dependent changes in mammary luminal epithelial cells using cysteine- and lysine-labelling two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis.
Chan HL; Gharbi S; Gaffney PR; Cramer R; Waterfield MD; Timms JF
Proteomics; 2005 Jul; 5(11):2908-26. PubMed ID: 15954156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
