147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12549450)
1. Your country needs you.
Edwards R
New Sci; 2000 Nov; 168(2264):11. PubMed ID: 12549450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical testing: issues and ethics.
Mossman KL
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):90-101. PubMed ID: 12962094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In the name of national security: lessons from the final report on the human radiation experiments.
Lemmens T
Eur J Health Law; 1999 Mar; 6(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 11657812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Military personnel may have been human subjects without their informed consent.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Aug; 18(8):9. PubMed ID: 15119340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Secret human experiments test trust in government.
Guttman D
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 12962097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. troops were subjected to a wider toxic testing.
Shanker T
N Y Times Web; 2002 Oct; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12474840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. tested a nerve gas in Hawaii.
Shanker T
N Y Times Web; 2002 Nov; ():A24. PubMed ID: 12474844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The front lines of biowarfare: today's anti-terrorism effort casts early test subjects in new light.
Snyder D
Washington Post; 2003 May; ():B1, B5. PubMed ID: 12812180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical aerobics: ACHRE's flight from responsibility.
Egilman D; Wallace W; Stubbs C; Mora-Corrasco F
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):15-61. PubMed ID: 11660589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disclosure and consent: through the Cold War prism.
Guttman D
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 11660585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Without consent. Interview by Charles Seife.
Moreno J
New Sci; 1999 Nov; 164(2212):48-51. PubMed ID: 11885630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bearing true faith and allegiance? Allowing recovery for soldiers under fire in military experiments that violate the Nuremberg Code.
O'Connor MJ
Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 2002; 25(3):649-86. PubMed ID: 16514768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation.
Rothman DJ
JAMA; 1996 Aug; 276(5):421-3. PubMed ID: 11644795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation report in retrospect.
Eisenbud M
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 12962101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An ethicist's perspective on human radiation tests.
Graber GC
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 12962098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. to compensate 4,000 exposed to poison gases.
Leary WE
N Y Times Web; 1993 Jan; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11646950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A public culture for guinea pigs: US human research subjects after the Tuskegee study.
Weinstein M
Sci Cult (Lond); 2001 Jun; 10(2):195-223. PubMed ID: 15971362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cold war at Porton Down: informed consent in Britain's biological and chemical warfare experiments.
Schmidt U
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2006; 15(4):366-80. PubMed ID: 17066763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How does an accident become an experiment? Secret science and the exposure of the public to biological warfare agents.
Balmer B
Sci Cult (Lond); 2004 Jun; 13(2):197-228. PubMed ID: 15988847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A little too much of the Buchenwald touch? Military radiation research at the University of Cincinnati, 1960-1972.
Egilman D; Wallace W; Stubbs C; Mora-Corrasco F
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):63-102. PubMed ID: 11660591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
