These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12549582)

  • 1. Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance?
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Pointer L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 12549582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The TECO theory and lawful dependency in successive episodic memory tests.
    Sikström S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):693-728. PubMed ID: 10994226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McKinney VM; Gee NR; Janczura GA
    Psychol Rev; 1998 Apr; 105(2):299-324. PubMed ID: 9577240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models.
    Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Ceo D
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1014-23. PubMed ID: 17910185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prior knowledge: the effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):957-67. PubMed ID: 2528608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Successive tests of pair recognition.
    Sikström SP
    Memory; 1998 Sep; 6(5):531-54. PubMed ID: 10197162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?
    Nelson DL; McKinney VM; McEvoy CL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 12747498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recall and recognition of verbal paired associates in early Alzheimer's disease.
    Lowndes GJ; Saling MM; Ames D; Chiu E; Gonzalez LM; Savage GR
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jul; 14(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 18577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
    Meltzer JA; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):433-62. PubMed ID: 17061694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of availability and accessibility in memory.
    Habib R; Nyberg L
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Jul; 18(7):1720-6. PubMed ID: 18033765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Activation and binding in verbal working memory: a dual-process model for the recognition of nonwords.
    Oberauer K; Lange EB
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):102-36. PubMed ID: 18757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masked priming with orthographic neighbors: a test of the lexical competition assumption.
    Nakayama M; Sears CR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1236-60. PubMed ID: 18823208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonetic-semantic mediated false recognition: does activation fail to spread?
    Wallace WP; Salapska-Gelleri J; Belz CL; Owen MA
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(4):585-617. PubMed ID: 17286090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition.
    Lamberts K; Brockdorff N; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):351-78. PubMed ID: 13678373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue set size effects: sampling activated associates or cross-target interference?
    Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Xu J
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 10355236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.