These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12549585)

  • 21. The role of causal models in analogical inference.
    Lee HS; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1111-22. PubMed ID: 18763895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account.
    Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1365-76. PubMed ID: 22545608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies.
    Karelaia N; Hogarth RM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 134(3):404-26. PubMed ID: 18444703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Insight and strategy in multiple-cue learning.
    Lagnado DA; Newell BR; Kahan S; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):162-83. PubMed ID: 16719649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rational learning and information sampling: on the "naivety" assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases.
    Le Mens G; Denrell J
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):379-92. PubMed ID: 21480741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Structure and strength in causal induction.
    Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Dec; 51(4):334-84. PubMed ID: 16168981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [On the validity of applying associative learning model to the acquisition process of human contingency judgment].
    Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1999 Dec; 70(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 10756589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Linda is not a bearded lady: configural weighting and adding as the cause of extension errors.
    Nilsson H; Winman A; Juslin P; Hansson G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):517-34. PubMed ID: 19883134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; More P; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pseudocontingencies: an integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion.
    Fiedler K; Freytag P; Meiser T
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):187-206. PubMed ID: 19159153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inferring causality assessments from predictive responses: cue interaction without cue competition.
    Winman A; Gredebäck G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 16556555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cognitive biases in three prediction tasks: a test of the cognitive model of depression.
    Strunk DR; Adler AD
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Jan; 47(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19010460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bayesian analysis of interleaved learning and response bias in behavioral experiments.
    Smith AC; Wirth S; Suzuki WA; Brown EN
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 97(3):2516-24. PubMed ID: 17182907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The propositional nature of human associative learning.
    Mitchell CJ; De Houwer J; Lovibond PF
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Apr; 32(2):183-98; discussion 198-246. PubMed ID: 19386174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.