27 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12549589)
1. Predictive structure building in language comprehension: a large sample study on incremental licensing and parallelism.
Fujita H
Cogn Process; 2023 May; 24(2):301-311. PubMed ID: 36929033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chinese EFL learners different from English natives in cataphora resolution: Evidence from eye-tracking studies.
Wang T; Geng M; Wang Y; Zhao M; Zhou T; Yang Y
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1126673. PubMed ID: 36910751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parsers and Grammars: A Tutorial Overview from the Linguistics Building.
Acuña-Fariña C
Brain Sci; 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36552119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Processing cataphors: Active antecedent search is persistent.
Giskes A; Kush D
Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1370-1386. PubMed ID: 33974237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiological differences in older and younger adults' anaphoric but not cataphoric pronoun processing in the absence of age-related behavioural slowdown.
Arslan S; Palasis K; Meunier F
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19234. PubMed ID: 33159127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delayed Application of Binding Condition C During Cataphoric Pronoun Resolution.
Patterson C; Felser C
J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):453-475. PubMed ID: 30443890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Backward Dependencies and
Pablos L; Doetjes J; Cheng LL
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2237. PubMed ID: 29375417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Active search for antecedents in cataphoric pronoun resolution.
Pablos L; Doetjes J; Ruijgrok B; Cheng LL
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1638. PubMed ID: 26579023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hyper-active gap filling.
Omaki A; Lau EF; Davidson White I; Dakan ML; Apple A; Phillips C
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():384. PubMed ID: 25914658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A structural distance effect for backward anaphora in Broca's area: an fMRI study.
Matchin W; Sprouse J; Hickok G
Brain Lang; 2014 Nov; 138():1-11. PubMed ID: 25261745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity to syntactic changes in garden path sentences.
Christianson K
J Psycholinguist Res; 2008 Nov; 37(6):391-403. PubMed ID: 18443907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.
Folk JR; Morris RK
Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 12699146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How do Antecedent Semantics Influence Pronoun Interpretation? Evidence from Eye Movements.
Simovic TV; Chambers CG
Cogn Sci; 2023 Feb; 47(2):e13251. PubMed ID: 36745513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "They" as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: eye tracking reveals a processing cost.
Sanford AJ; Filik R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Feb; 60(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 17455052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study.
Hyönä J; Bertram R; Pollatsek A
Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):523-32. PubMed ID: 15478747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment.
van Gompel RP; Liversedge SP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):128-39. PubMed ID: 12549589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When is cataphoric reference recognised?
Filik R; Sanford AJ
Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1112-21. PubMed ID: 18067884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
