These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12549674)

  • 1. Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection.
    Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    Mol Divers; 2002; 5(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 12549674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection.
    Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002; 16(5-6):357-69. PubMed ID: 12489684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does rational selection of training and test sets improve the outcome of QSAR modeling?
    Martin TM; Harten P; Young DM; Muratov EN; Golbraikh A; Zhu H; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2570-8. PubMed ID: 23030316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of validated QSAR models of D1 dopaminergic antagonists for database mining.
    Oloff S; Mailman RB; Tropsha A
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(23):7322-32. PubMed ID: 16279792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models.
    Golbraikh A; Shen M; Xiao Z; Xiao YD; Lee KH; Tropsha A
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003; 17(2-4):241-53. PubMed ID: 13677490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. QSAR modeling using chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology.
    Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 12546547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of P-glycoprotein substrates.
    de Cerqueira Lima P; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao Y; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1245-54. PubMed ID: 16711744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beware of q2!
    Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    J Mol Graph Model; 2002 Jan; 20(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 11858635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of QSAR Equations for Virtual Screening.
    Spiegel J; Senderowitz H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33105703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact assessment of the rational selection of training and test sets on the predictive ability of QSAR models.
    Andrada MF; Vega-Hissi EG; Estrada MR; Garro Martinez JC
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1011-1023. PubMed ID: 29135323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel approach to evolutionary neural network based descriptor selection and QSAR model development.
    Debeljak Z; Marohnić V; Srecnik G; Medić-Sarić M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2005 Dec; 19(12):835-55. PubMed ID: 16607572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PV
    Dong Y; Xiang B; Du D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 May; 57(5):1055-1067. PubMed ID: 28419798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CoMFA-based prediction of agonist affinities at recombinant D1 vs D2 dopamine receptors.
    Wilcox RE; Tseng T; Brusniak MY; Ginsburg B; Pearlman RS; Teeter M; DuRand C; Starr S; Neve KA
    J Med Chem; 1998 Oct; 41(22):4385-99. PubMed ID: 9784114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. QSAR modelling of a large imbalanced aryl hydrocarbon activation dataset by rational and random sampling and screening of 80,086 REACH pre-registered and/or registered substances.
    Klimenko K; Rosenberg SA; Dybdahl M; Wedebye EB; Nikolov NG
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213848. PubMed ID: 30870500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F.
    Wang XS; Tang H; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive QSAR modeling of CCR5 antagonist piperidine derivatives using chemometric tools.
    Roy K; Mandal AS
    J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem; 2009 Feb; 24(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18608745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds.
    Shen M; Béguin C; Golbraikh A; Stables JP; Kohn H; Tropsha A
    J Med Chem; 2004 Apr; 47(9):2356-64. PubMed ID: 15084134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rank order entropy: why one metric is not enough.
    McLellan MR; Ryan MD; Breneman CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2302-19. PubMed ID: 21875058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the QSAR's predictive truthfulness of the novel N-tuple discrete derivative indices on benchmark datasets.
    Martínez-Santiago O; Marrero-Ponce Y; Vivas-Reyes R; Rivera-Borroto OM; Hurtado E; Treto-Suarez MA; Ramos Y; Vergara-Murillo F; Orozco-Ugarriza ME; Martínez-López Y
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 May; 28(5):367-389. PubMed ID: 28590848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.