These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12553391)

  • 1. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.
    Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Xue FS; Mao P; Liu HP; Yang QY; Li CW; He N; Xu YC; Liao X
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Mishra SK; Nawaz M; Satyapraksh MV; Parida S; Bidkar PU; Hemavathy B; Kundra P
    Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2015; 2015():705869. PubMed ID: 25648620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients.
    Cook TM; Nolan JP; Verghese C; Strube PJ; Lees M; Millar JM; Baskett PJ
    Br J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 88(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 12066729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices.
    Park SH; Han SH; Do SH; Kim JW; Kim JH
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 19095838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
    Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients.
    Goldmann K; Jakob C
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1605-1610. PubMed ID: 15920181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
    Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LMA ProSeal(TM) vs. i-Gel(TM) in ventilated children: a randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask.
    Gasteiger L; Brimacombe J; Oswald E; Perkhofer D; Tonin A; Keller C; Tiefenthaler W
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Nov; 56(10):1321-4. PubMed ID: 22946775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
    Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized comparison of the Baska FESS mask and the LMA Supreme in different head and neck positions.
    Foo LL; Shariffuddin II; Chaw SH; Lee PK; Lee CE; Chen YS; Chan L
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Aug; 15(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 30095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure.
    Somri M; Vaida S; Garcia Fornari G; Mendoza GR; Charco-Mora P; Hawash N; Matter I; Swaid F; Gaitini L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 27716165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
    Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.