These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12553404)

  • 1. A study on the adhesion of restorative materials to irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
    Güldag MU; Yesil D
    Int Dent J; 2002 Dec; 52(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 12553404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesion of restorations to impression materials.
    Millstein PL; Maya A; Segura JC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7575963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.
    Smith SJ; McCord JF; Macfarlane TV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pouring.
    Nassar U; Hussein B; Oko A; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2012; 78():c2. PubMed ID: 22322019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of a combined reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression system with other commonly used impression materials.
    Herring HW; Tames MA; Zardiackas LD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Dec; 52(6):795-9. PubMed ID: 6392511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids (alginates) for fixed prosthodontics. A comparison between irreversible hydrocolloid, reversible hydrocolloid, and addition silicone for use in the syringe-tray technique.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Apr; 106(2 Pt 1):651-60. PubMed ID: 9584912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New restorative dental materials.
    Hembree JH
    Ark Dent J; 1980 Jun; 51(2):11-6. PubMed ID: 6775618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Mendez AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Check bite impressions using irreversible alginate/reversible hydrocolloid combination.
    Scott GK; Hawkins L; Chetwyn J; Doughty T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 9029470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reversible-irreversible hydrocolloid impressions for composite onlays.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2005 Dec; 24(12):56, 58-61; quiz 61. PubMed ID: 16396160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial moulage: the effect of a retarder on compressive strength and working and setting times of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Lemon JC; Okay DJ; Powers JM; Martin JW; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 12942062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of various spray disinfectants on irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials: an in vitro study.
    Doddamani S; Patil RA; Gangadhar SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):764-9. PubMed ID: 22484867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and bond strength of reversible with irreversible hydrocolloid impression systems: a comparative study.
    Heisler WH; Tjan AH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):578-84. PubMed ID: 1403933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.