These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12553404)

  • 21. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions.
    Burton JF; Hood JA; Plunkett DJ; Johnson SS
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):121-3. PubMed ID: 2671076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study.
    Marafie Y; Looney S; Nelson S; Chan D; Browning W; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 19033027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relating the marginal fit of the castings to the accuracy of the impressions made from laminated hydrocolloid impression technique: a comparative study.
    Sinha MR; Thakur B; Gaikwad A; Chaudhari LD; Kulkarni A; Kulkarni H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Mar; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional investigation of the accuracy of impression materials after disinfection.
    Kern M; Rathmer RM; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Nov; 70(5):449-56. PubMed ID: 8254550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions: a comparative study.
    McNeill MR; Coulter WA; Hussey DL
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 1339136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and alternative impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts.
    Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 23031732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials as a function of pouring time: a systematic review.
    Nassar U; Aziz T; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 21821167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laboratory evaluation of the reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique.
    Thomasz FG; Chong MP; Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1988 Dec; 33(6):496-500. PubMed ID: 3072945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impression technique for partially edentulous patients.
    Nissan J; Barnea E; Krauze E; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 12239486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dimensional Accuracy of Alginate Impressions Using Different Methods of Disinfection With Varying Concentrations.
    Babiker GH; Khalifa N; Alhajj MN
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e17-e20. PubMed ID: 29293017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the gray level of restorative materials using cone-beam computed tomography: A cross-sectional study.
    Hadadi P; Ostovarrad F; Nikbin A; Ranjzad H; Ghasemi F; Nemati S
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):267-274. PubMed ID: 30328304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Disinfection procedures: their efficacy and effect on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Rentzia A; Coleman DC; O'Donnell MJ; Dowling AH; O'Sullivan M
    J Dent; 2011 Feb; 39(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 21093528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An in vitro investigation into the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid alternatives.
    Patel RD; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 20970539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.