These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12555050)

  • 1. Measuring population health: a comparison of three generic health status measures.
    Macran S; Weatherly H; Kind P
    Med Care; 2003 Feb; 41(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 12555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
    Petrou S; Hockley C
    Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population.
    Bharmal M; Thomas J
    Value Health; 2006; 9(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 16903996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire.
    König HH; Bernert S; Angermeyer MC; Matschinger H; Martinez M; Vilagut G; Haro JM; de Girolamo G; de Graaf R; Kovess V; Alonso J;
    Med Care; 2009 Feb; 47(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 19169128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D utility measures in 813 patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
    Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
    J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21532054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada.
    Johnson JA; Pickard AS
    Med Care; 2000 Jan; 38(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 10630726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease.
    van Stel HF; Buskens E
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Mar; 4():20. PubMed ID: 16563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probabilistic mapping of the health status measure SF-12 onto the health utility measure EQ-5D using the US-population-based scoring models.
    Le QA
    Qual Life Res; 2014 Mar; 23(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 24026631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints.
    Grutters JP; Joore MA; van der Horst F; Verschuure H; Dreschler WA; Anteunis LJ
    Qual Life Res; 2007 Oct; 16(8):1439-49. PubMed ID: 17647093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D responses using scoring algorithms derived from similar valuation exercises.
    Whitehurst DG; Norman R; Brazier JE; Viney R
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 25128050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D for individuals aged >or= 45 years.
    Barton GR; Sach TH; Avery AJ; Jenkinson C; Doherty M; Whynes DK; Muir KR
    Health Econ; 2008 Jul; 17(7):815-32. PubMed ID: 17893863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the discriminatory power of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon's indices.
    Bas Janssen MF; Birnie E; Bonsel GJ
    Qual Life Res; 2007 Jun; 16(5):895-904. PubMed ID: 17294285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument in a Greek general population.
    Kontodimopoulos N; Pappa E; Niakas D; Yfantopoulos J; Dimitrakaki C; Tountas Y
    Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1162-9. PubMed ID: 18489492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Taiwanese version of the EQ-5D: validation in a representative sample of the Taiwanese population.
    Chang TJ; Tarn YH; Hsieh CL; Liou WS; Shaw JW; Chiou XG
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2007 Dec; 106(12):1023-31. PubMed ID: 18194908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia.
    McCrone P; Patel A; Knapp M; Schene A; Koeter M; Amaddeo F; Ruggeri M; Giessler A; Puschner B; Thornicroft G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19346564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample.
    Johnson JA; Coons SJ
    Qual Life Res; 1998 Feb; 7(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 9523497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The responsiveness of EQ-5D utility scores in patients with depression: A comparison with instruments measuring quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning.
    Günther OH; Roick C; Angermeyer MC; König HH
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Jan; 105(1-3):81-91. PubMed ID: 17532051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. General population norms for the EQ-5D-3 L in Norway: comparison of postal and web surveys.
    Stavem K; Augestad LA; Kristiansen IS; Rand K
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Oct; 16(1):204. PubMed ID: 30340499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments.
    Chen G; Flynn T; Stevens K; Brazier J; Huynh E; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Ratcliffe J
    Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 26091597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.