These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1255551)

  • 41. [Intra-uterine contraceptive devices in nulliparous women: a retrospective study].
    Cabral AC; Celani MF; Roquette AL
    J Bras Ginecol; 1985; 95(6):231-3. PubMed ID: 12267708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Post coital contraception.
    Haspels AA; Van Santen MR
    J Gynaecol Endocrinol; 1986; 2(1-2):17-24. PubMed ID: 12269214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Ectopic pregnancy in women who use intrauterine contraceptive devices].
    Curcić A; Orelj M; Novakov A; Stojilković-Mikić T; Kapamadzija A
    Med Pregl; 1997; 50(5-6):212-4. PubMed ID: 9297053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Intrauterine devices of a reduced size in nulliparous patients. Experience with Mini-Copper-7].
    Calzolari E; Marziale G; Cersosimo L; Ciarrocchi F
    Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1983; 11(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 12339321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Risks of contraception and pregnancy in patients with congenital cardiopathies. Retrospective study on 108 patients].
    Rabajoli F; Aruta E; Presbitero P; Todros T
    G Ital Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 22(10):1133-7. PubMed ID: 1291407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing the health risks and benefits of contraceptive choices.
    Kost K; Forrest JD; Harlap S
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 2060612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Health risks of intrauterine contraception (author's transl)].
    Keith LG; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Jun; 11(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 12338737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Uterine measurements in the fitting of intrauterine devices].
    Theron F; Wessels PH
    S Afr Med J; 1984 Jun; 65(26):1054-6. PubMed ID: 6740420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Letter: Copper seven intra-uterine device.
    Havenga HR
    S Afr Med J; 1973 Dec; 47(47):2260. PubMed ID: 4767896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Pregnancy on an intra-uterine device. Ultrasound-guided forceps removal of the intra-uterine device].
    Rudigoz RC; Mermet J; Dargent D
    Presse Med; 1986 Jun; 15(24):1155. PubMed ID: 2942913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Letter: The copper-T intra-uterine device.
    Karstadt B
    S Afr Med J; 1976 Mar; 50(12):462. PubMed ID: 1273710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Which intra-uterine device should we favour?
    Trewinnard K
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2001 Apr; 27(2):115. PubMed ID: 12463223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Intra-urine device and embryonic survival in the rat.
    DeBoer KF; Anderson LL; Melampy RM
    J Reprod Fertil; 1970 Mar; 21(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 5443216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. INTRA-UTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES.
    GUTTMACHER AF
    J Reprod Fertil; 1965 Aug; 10():115-28. PubMed ID: 14337801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects and mode of action of intra-uterine devices.
    Marston JH; Kelly WA
    Vet Rec; 1966 Nov; 79(22):644-8. PubMed ID: 5970424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Intra-uterine foreign body and pregnancy in pigs.
    Rathmacher RP; Anderson LL; Kawata K; Melampy RM
    J Reprod Fertil; 1967 Jun; 13(3):559-61. PubMed ID: 6029181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Combined (intra- and extra-uterine) full-term living pregnancies.
    THERON R
    S Afr Med J; 1950 Feb; 24(5):69-71. PubMed ID: 15405244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Value of a Nulliparous Uterus.
    Testa G; Johannesson L
    Transplantation; 2021 May; 105(5):958-959. PubMed ID: 32541560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Removal of an intra-uterine contraceptive device per rectum.
    Hogston P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Jul; 7(1):75. PubMed ID: 29480112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Some remarks on factors influencing the failure of intra-uterine devices].
    Sadovsky A; Adoni A; Schenker JG
    Harefuah; 1970 Mar; 78(5):247-8. PubMed ID: 5532215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.