These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12555755)

  • 1. [Studies on automated detection methods and related techniques for mammographic masses].
    Matsubara T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Oct; 58(10):1411-3. PubMed ID: 12555755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital mammography: novel applications.
    Rafferty EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated detection and classification of breast tumors.
    Ng SL; Bischof WF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1992 Jun; 25(3):218-37. PubMed ID: 1611889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic masses using scalable image retrieval.
    Jiang M; Zhang S; Li H; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Feb; 62(2):783-92. PubMed ID: 25361497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an automated method for detecting mammographic masses with a partial loss of region.
    Hatanaka Y; Hara T; Fujita H; Kasai S; Endo T; Iwase T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1209-14. PubMed ID: 11811821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
    Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using local context information to improve automatic mammographic mass detection.
    Velikova M; Lucas PJ; Karssemeijerb N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 2):1291-5. PubMed ID: 20841893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated analysis of mammographic densities.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 May; 41(5):909-23. PubMed ID: 8735257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Vyborny CJ; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):725-40. PubMed ID: 10943274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of tiny and large calcification in breast: a study on mammographic image analysis.
    Bhattacharya M; Das A
    Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2010; 6(4):418-34. PubMed ID: 20940127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advances in mammographic imaging.
    Robson KJ
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 83(988):273-5. PubMed ID: 20223907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.
    Elter M; Horsch A
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2052-68. PubMed ID: 19610294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False positive reduction in mammographic mass detection using local binary patterns.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí J
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):286-93. PubMed ID: 18051070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model-based framework for the detection of spiculated masses on mammography.
    Sampat MP; Bovik AC; Whitman GJ; Markey MK
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2110-23. PubMed ID: 18561687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.