These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12555792)

  • 1. Female choice in Drosophila: evidence from Hawaii and implications for evolutionary biology.
    Carson HL
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):383-93. PubMed ID: 12555792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
    Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assortative mating in Drosophila adapted to a microsite ecological gradient.
    Singh SR; Rashkovetsky E; Iliadi K; Nevo E; Korol A
    Behav Genet; 2005 Nov; 35(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 16273320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for minority male mating success and minority female mating disadvantage in Drosophila ananassae.
    Som A; Singh BN
    Genet Mol Res; 2005 Mar; 4(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 15841431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data.
    Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons of Hawaiian Drosophilidae.
    Alves H; Rouault JD; Kondoh Y; Nakano Y; Yamamoto D; Kim YK; Jallon JM
    Behav Genet; 2010 Sep; 40(5):694-705. PubMed ID: 20480222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection in Drosophila silvestris of Hawaii.
    Spiess EB; Carson HL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 May; 78(5):3088-92. PubMed ID: 16593021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolutionary experiments on mate recognition in the Drosophila serrata species complex.
    Blows MW; Higgie M
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):239-50. PubMed ID: 12555782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The genetic basis of behavioral isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia.
    McNabney DR
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2182-90. PubMed ID: 22759294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females.
    Gleason JM; James RA; Wicker-Thomas C; Ritchie MG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2009 Nov; 103(5):416-24. PubMed ID: 19654611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No evidence for minority male mating advantage in wild type strains of Drosophila ananassae tested in multiple-choice experiments.
    Som A; Singh BN
    Genet Mol Res; 2002 Dec; 1(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 14963822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations.
    Castrezana SJ; Markow TA
    Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 18561017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drosophila bipectinata species complex.
    Singh S; Singh BN
    Indian J Exp Biol; 2001 Sep; 39(9):835-44. PubMed ID: 11831362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of Drosophila on the newer Hawaiian volcanoes.
    Carson HL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1982 Feb; 48(Pt 1):3-25. PubMed ID: 7042651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.