These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12556266)
1. Facial slot Class II restorations: a conservative technique revisited. Ewoldsen N J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12556266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars. Croll TP ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restoration of posterior teeth with proximal carious lesions. Morand JM; Jonas P Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 8602418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Class III posterior composite restoration. Lacy AM Dent Today; 2002 Mar; 21(3):80-2, 84-5. PubMed ID: 11915224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries. Smales RJ; Yip HK Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth. Hasselrot L Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities. Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement. Croll TP Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reinforced glass ionomer restorations in modified Class II cavities]. Valenzuela V; Stanke F Odontol Chil; 1989 Apr; 37(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 2518367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Light-hardened Class I glass-ionomer-resin cement restoration of a permanent molar. Croll TP Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8511261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The theory and practice of internal 'tunnel' restorations: a review of the literature and observations on clinical performance over eight years in practice. Jones SE Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 11819878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations. Wiegand A; Attin T Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options. Lyons K; N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for primary teeth: review of literature. Smales RJ; Yip HK Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 10969434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tunnel restorations versus class II restorations for small proximal lesions: a comparison of tooth strengths. Papa J; Cain C; Messer HH; Wilson PR Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 8511270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A technique for restoring Class V caries in primary canines. Margolis FS Gen Dent; 2008 May; 56(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 19288837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]