182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12556778)
1. Adequacy of mucosal sampling with the "two-bite" forceps technique: a prospective, randomized, blinded study.
Padda S; Shah I; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 12556778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Martinek J; Maluskova J; Stefanova M; Tuckova I; Suchanek S; Vackova Z; Krajciova J; Kollar M; Zavoral M; Spicak J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5328-35. PubMed ID: 25954107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An observer-blinded, prospective, randomized comparison of forceps for endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
Schafer TW; Hollis-Perry KM; Mondragon RM; Brann OS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11818921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Jumbo forceps are superior to standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatory bowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens.
Elmunzer BJ; Higgins PD; Kwon YM; Golembeski C; Greenson JK; Korsnes SJ; Elta GH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Aug; 68(2):273-8; quiz 334, 336. PubMed ID: 18155204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study of disposable alligator-jaw biopsy forceps for gastric mucosal biopsy.
Abudayyeh S; Hoffman J; El-Zimaity HT; Graham DY
Dig Liver Dis; 2009 May; 41(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 18799373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a new jumbo forceps improves tissue acquisition of Barrett's esophagus surveillance biopsies.
Komanduri S; Swanson G; Keefer L; Jakate S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Dec; 70(6):1072-8.e1. PubMed ID: 19595312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical aspects in endoscopic biopsy of lesions in esophageal pemphigus vulgaris.
Galloro G; Diamantis G; Magno L; Inzirillo M; Mignogna MC; Mignogna C; De Rosa G; Iovino P
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Apr; 39(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 17307037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy.
Sussman DA; Deshpande AR; Shankar U; Barkin JA; Medina AM; Poppiti RJ; Cubeddu LX; Barkin JS
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Aug; 61(8):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 27003145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy of specimens obtained with 16 different biopsy forceps designed for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Danesh BJ; Burke M; Newman J; Aylott A; Whitfield P; Cotton PB
Gut; 1985 Mar; 26(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 3972269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study.
Woods KL; Anand BS; Cole RA; Osato MS; Genta RM; Malaty H; Gurer IE; Rossi DD
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 9925695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions.
Ji JS; Lee BI; Choi KY; Kim BW; Choi H; Huh M; Chung WC; Chae HS; Chung IS
Korean J Intern Med; 2009 Jun; 24(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 19543487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized comparison of 3 different-sized biopsy forceps for quality of sampling in Barrett's esophagus.
Gonzalez S; Yu WM; Smith MS; Slack KN; Rotterdam H; Abrams JA; Lightdale CJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Nov; 72(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 21034895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.
Walter T; Chesnay AL; Dumortier J; Mège-LeChevallier F; Hervieu V; Guillaud O; Lapalus MG; Lépilliez V; Fumex F; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19661817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.
Chu KM; Yuen ST; Wong WM; Wong KW; Lai KC; Hu WH; Leung SY; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC
Endoscopy; 2003 Apr; 35(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 12664392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle.
Bernstein DE; Barkin JS; Reiner DK; Lubin J; Phillips RS; Grauer L
Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Jun; 41(6):573-6. PubMed ID: 7672551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adequacy of esophageal squamous mucosa specimens obtained during endoscopy: are standard biopsies sufficient for postablation surveillance in Barrett's esophagus?
Gupta N; Mathur SC; Dumot JA; Singh V; Gaddam S; Wani SB; Bansal A; Rastogi A; Goldblum JR; Sharma P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 21907985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS: a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection.
Cantor MJ; Davila RE; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jul; 64(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 16813799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adequacy of disposable biopsy forceps for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a direct comparison with reusable forceps.
Yang R; Vuitch F; Wright K; McCarthy J
Gastrointest Endosc; 1990; 36(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 2210280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The association of short segment Barrett's esophagus with intestinal metaplasia in stomach.
Tuncer I; Ugraş S; Uygan I; Türkdoğan K; Kösem M
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2003 Mar; 14(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 14593535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A New Method for Endoscopic Sampling of Submucosal Tissue in the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Comparison of the Biopsy Forceps and a New Drill Instrument.
Walther C; Jeremiasen M; Rissler P; Johansson JL; Larsson MS; Walther BS
Surg Innov; 2016 Dec; 23(6):572-580. PubMed ID: 27126252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
