190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12556951)
1. Current applications and future direction of MR mammography.
Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW; Drew PJ
Br J Cancer; 2003 Jan; 88(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 12556951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D-MR mammography-guided breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical results and future perspectives with reference to FDG-PET.
Nakamura S; Kenjo H; Nishio T; Kazama T; Do O; Suzuki K
Breast Cancer; 2001; 8(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 11791129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast diseases].
Boné BK; Szabó B; Palkó A; Aspelin P
Orv Hetil; 2001 Sep; 142(39):2123-31. PubMed ID: 11723831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: potential for lesion characterization.
Rotaru N; Luciani A
J BUON; 2004; 9(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 17385833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer?
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Dominelli V; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17203383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Preoperative MR mammography in breast carcinoma. Effect on operative treatment from the surgical viewpoint].
Gatzemeier W; Liersch T; Stylianou A; Buttler A; Becker H; Fischer U
Chirurg; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1460-8. PubMed ID: 10637703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail.
Lubina N; Schedelbeck U; Roth A; Weng AM; Geissinger E; Hönig A; Hahn D; Bley TA
Eur Radiol; 2015 May; 25(5):1285-93. PubMed ID: 25433415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Modern diagnostics of the breast].
Kaiser WA; Diedrich K; Reiser M; Krebs D
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 53(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 8382649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.
Weinstein S; Rosen M
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast imaging. A look at current and future technologies.
Samuels TH
Postgrad Med; 1998 Nov; 104(5):91-4, 97-101. PubMed ID: 9823387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.
Robertson C; Arcot Ragupathy SK; Boachie C; Dixon JM; Fraser C; Hernández R; Heys S; Jack W; Kerr GR; Lawrence G; MacLennan G; Maxwell A; McGregor J; Mowatt G; Pinder S; Ternent L; Thomas RE; Vale L; Wilson R; Zhu S; Gilbert FJ
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Sep; 15(34):v-vi, 1-322. PubMed ID: 21951942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of MR-mammography as a solitary imaging technique in women with dense breasts: an economic evaluation of the prospective TK-Study.
Froelich MF; Kaiser CG
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):967-974. PubMed ID: 32856166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of specificity on cost-effectiveness of screening women at high risk of breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging, mammography and ultrasound.
Kaiser CG; Dietzel M; Vag T; Rübenthaler J; Froelich MF; Tollens F
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109576. PubMed ID: 33556759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-operative staging of invasive breast cancer with MR mammography and/or PET: boon or bunk?
Rieber A; Schirrmeister H; Gabelmann A; Nuessle K; Reske S; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Kuehn T
Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):789-98. PubMed ID: 12381687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical pathways for the future: MR imaging and digital mammography.
Newstead GM; Weinreb JC
Radiographics; 1995 Jul; 15(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 7569140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(3):1-55. PubMed ID: 23074406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of galactography for the diagnostic work-up of pathological nipple discharge in multimodal breast diagnostics. Part 2: a systematic review of the literature].
Scheurlen K; Schnitzer A; Krammer J; Kaiser C; Schönberg SO; Wasser K
Radiologe; 2014 Feb; 54(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 24233402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the rupture of silicone breast implants by mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients: correlation with surgical findings.
Scaranelo AM; Marques AF; Smialowski EB; Lederman HM
Sao Paulo Med J; 2004 Mar; 122(2):41-7. PubMed ID: 15257358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery.
Zhang Y; Fukatsu H; Naganawa S; Satake H; Sato Y; Ohiwa M; Endo T; Ichihara S; Ishigaki T
Breast Cancer; 2002; 9(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 12185335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
