BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12557191)

  • 1. Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent.
    Linge JP; Williams MA; Spronk CA; Bonvin AM; Nilges M
    Proteins; 2003 Feb; 50(3):496-506. PubMed ID: 12557191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refinement of NMR structures using implicit solvent and advanced sampling techniques.
    Chen J; Im W; Brooks CL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(49):16038-47. PubMed ID: 15584737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nuclear magnetic resonance-based modeling and refinement of protein three-dimensional structures and their complexes.
    Fuentes G; van Dijk AD; Bonvin AM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():229-55. PubMed ID: 18446291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of protein solution structures refined by molecular dynamics simulation in vacuum, with a generalized Born model, and with explicit water.
    Xia B; Tsui V; Case DA; Dyson HJ; Wright PE
    J Biomol NMR; 2002 Apr; 22(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 12018480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent.
    Zhou R
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):148-61. PubMed ID: 14517967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy minimization of globular proteins with solvent effects included. Comparison of empirical solvation energy terms and explicit water treatment.
    Kierzek A; Zielenkiewicz P
    Acta Biochim Pol; 1997; 44(3):549-56. PubMed ID: 9511964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model.
    Patel S; Mackerell AD; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Sep; 25(12):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15224394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular dynamics simulations of peptides and proteins with a continuum electrostatic model based on screened Coulomb potentials.
    Hassan SA; Mehler EL; Zhang D; Weinstein H
    Proteins; 2003 Apr; 51(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 12596268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of non-bonded parameters on the quality of NMR structures: a new force field for NMR structure calculation.
    Linge JP; Nilges M
    J Biomol NMR; 1999 Jan; 13(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 10905826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient minimization of angle-dependent potentials for polypeptides in internal coordinates.
    Wedemeyer WJ; Baker D
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 14517977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the solvent on the conformation of a depsipeptide: NMR-derived solution structure of hormaomycin in DMSO from residual dipolar couplings in a novel DMSO-compatible alignment medium.
    Reinscheid UM; Farjon J; Radzom M; Haberz P; Zeeck A; Blackledge M; Griesinger C
    Chembiochem; 2006 Feb; 7(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 16416488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An empirical backbone-backbone hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins and its applications to NMR structure refinement and validation.
    Grishaev A; Bax A
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jun; 126(23):7281-92. PubMed ID: 15186165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
    Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein structure determination by high-resolution solid-state NMR spectroscopy: application to microcrystalline ubiquitin.
    Zech SG; Wand AJ; McDermott AE
    J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Jun; 127(24):8618-26. PubMed ID: 15954766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refinement of protein crystal structures using energy restraints derived from linear-scaling quantum mechanics.
    Yu N; Yennawar HP; Merz KM
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Mar; 61(Pt 3):322-32. PubMed ID: 15735343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the transferability of atomic solvation parameters: Ab initio structural prediction of cyclic heptapeptides in DMSO.
    Baysal C; Meirovitch H
    Biopolymers; 2000 Nov; 54(6):416-28. PubMed ID: 10951328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of the free energy of polarization: quantifying the effect of explicitly treating electronic polarization on the transferability of force-field parameters.
    Geerke DP; van Gunsteren WF
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Jun; 111(23):6425-36. PubMed ID: 17508737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation?
    Clore GM; Schwieters CD
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Mar; 126(9):2923-38. PubMed ID: 14995210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources of and solutions to problems in the refinement of protein NMR structures against torsion angle potentials of mean force.
    Kuszewski J; Clore GM
    J Magn Reson; 2000 Oct; 146(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 11001840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of protein loop geometries in solution.
    Rapp CS; Strauss T; Nederveen A; Fuentes G
    Proteins; 2007 Oct; 69(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 17588228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.