160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12557980)
1. An optimization algorithm for intensity modulated radiotherapy--the simulated dynamics with dose-volume constraints.
Hou Q; Wang J; Chen Y; Galvin JM
Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 12557980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beam orientation optimization for IMRT by a hybrid method of the genetic algorithm and the simulated dynamics.
Hou Q; Wang J; Chen Y; Galvin JM
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2360-7. PubMed ID: 14528958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absence of multiple local minima effects in intensity modulated optimization with dose-volume constraints.
Llacer J; Deasy JO; Portfeld TR; Solberg TD; Promberger C
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jan; 48(2):183-210. PubMed ID: 12587904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy using single-beam indices and integer programming.
D'Souza WD; Meyer RR; Shi L
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(15):3465-81. PubMed ID: 15379026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of a fast inverse dose optimization algorithm for IMRT via matrix inversion without negative beamlet intensities.
Goldman SP; Chen JZ; Battista JJ
Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):3007-16. PubMed ID: 16266115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Organ sparing by conformal avoidance intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: dosimetric evaluation of coverage of pelvis and inguinal/femoral nodes.
Chen YJ; Liu A; Tsai PT; Vora NL; Pezner RD; Schultheiss TE; Wong JY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):274-81. PubMed ID: 16111597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-guided dose-volume objectives.
Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Wu Y; Zhou J; Liu HH; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 12608607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IMRT: improvement in treatment planning efficiency using NTCP calculation independent of the dose-volume-histogram.
Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Grigorov L; Jiang R; Barnett RB
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1250-8. PubMed ID: 16752559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric evaluation of conventional radiotherapy, 3-D conformal radiotherapy and direct machine parameter optimisation intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer after conservative surgery.
Zhang F; Zheng M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Dec; 55(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 22141607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of split field and fixed jaw techniques for large IMRT target volumes in the head and neck.
Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19944592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and linac-IMRT treatment plans for head and neck cancer patients.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Moros EG; Corry PM; Yan Y; Ratanatharathorn V
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 19944587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT.
Zhang X; Liu H; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15191303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
