144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12558207)
21. A randomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings.
Manne SL; Coups EJ; Markowitz A; Meropol NJ; Haller D; Jacobsen PB; Jandorf L; Peterson SK; Lesko S; Pilipshen S; Winkel G
Ann Behav Med; 2009 Apr; 37(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 19418107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests: a 1997 survey of Massachusetts internists.
Schroy PC; Geller AC; Crosier Wood M; Page M; Sutherland L; Holm LJ; Heeren T
Prev Med; 2001 Nov; 33(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 11676578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The psychological impact of being offered surveillance colonoscopy following attendance at colorectal screening using flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Miles A; Atkin WS; Kralj-Hans I; Wardle J
J Med Screen; 2009; 16(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 19805753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of a brief multimedia psychoeducational intervention on the attitudes and interest of patients with cancer regarding clinical trial participation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Jacobsen PB; Wells KJ; Meade CD; Quinn GP; Lee JH; Fulp WJ; Gray JE; Baz RC; Springett GM; Levine RM; Markham MJ; Schreiber FJ; Cartwright TH; Burke JM; Siegel RD; Malafa MP; Sullivan D
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jul; 30(20):2516-21. PubMed ID: 22614993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Participation in a sigmoidoscopic colorectal cancer screening program: a pilot study.
Kremers SP; Mesters I; Pladdet IE; van den Borne B; Stockbrügger RW
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Oct; 9(10):1127-30. PubMed ID: 11045799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.
Green BB; Wang CY; Anderson ML; Chubak J; Meenan RT; Vernon SW; Fuller S
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Mar; 158(5 Pt 1):301-11. PubMed ID: 23460053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.
Ritvo P; Myers RE; Paszat L; Serenity M; Perez DF; Rabeneck L
BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():500. PubMed ID: 23706029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity of four self-reported colorectal cancer screening modalities in a general population: differences over time and by intervention assignment.
Jones RM; Mongin SJ; Lazovich D; Church TR; Yeazel MW
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):777-84. PubMed ID: 18381476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk subjects: a community-based pilot project.
Olynyk JK; Aquilia S; Fletcher DR; Dickinson JA
Med J Aust; 1996 Jul; 165(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 8692065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ethnic differences in participation in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in the UK.
Robb KA; Power E; Atkin W; Wardle J
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 18927095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial.
Holme Ø; Løberg M; Kalager M; Bretthauer M; Hernán MA; Aas E; Eide TJ; Skovlund E; Schneede J; Tveit KM; Hoff G
JAMA; 2014 Aug; 312(6):606-15. PubMed ID: 25117129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening.
McCaffery K; Wardle J; Nadel M; Atkin W
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(3):104-8. PubMed ID: 12370320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk people: update of a community-based project.
Collett JA; Olynyk JK; Platell CF
Med J Aust; 2000 Nov; 173(9):463-6. PubMed ID: 11149301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perceived barriers to flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer among UK ethnic minority groups: a qualitative study.
Austin KL; Power E; Solarin I; Atkin WS; Wardle J; Robb KA
J Med Screen; 2009; 16(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 20054091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Understanding intentions and action in colorectal cancer screening.
Power E; Van Jaarsveld CH; McCaffery K; Miles A; Atkin W; Wardle J
Ann Behav Med; 2008 Jun; 35(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 18575946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Explaining physician rates of providing flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Montaño DE; Phillips WR; Kasprzyk D
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Jul; 9(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 10919735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants.
Green BB; Wang CY; Horner K; Catz S; Meenan RT; Vernon SW; Carrell D; Chubak J; Ko C; Laing S; Bogart A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):589-603. PubMed ID: 20674774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.
Warren Andersen S; Blot WJ; Lipworth L; Steinwandel M; Murff HJ; Zheng W
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Dec; 2(12):e1917995. PubMed ID: 31860105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
