BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12558280)

  • 1. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
    Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CD1 hearing-impaired mice. II. Group latencies and optimal f2/f1 ratios of distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and scanning electron microscopy.
    Le Calvez S; Guilhaume A; Romand R; Aran JM; Avan P
    Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):51-61. PubMed ID: 9667430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2662-82. PubMed ID: 1479129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Neely ST; Gorga MP; Dorn PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1499-507. PubMed ID: 14514203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CD1 hearing-impaired mice. I: Distortion product otoacoustic emission levels, cochlear function and morphology.
    Le Calvez S; Avan P; Gilain L; Romand R
    Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):37-50. PubMed ID: 9667429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nieschalk M; Hustert B; Stoll W
    Audiology; 1998; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Transitory evoked and distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in absent auditory evoked potentials].
    Schöler C; Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    HNO; 1997 Dec; 45(12):1008-15. PubMed ID: 9486382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moulin A; Bera JC; Collet L
    Audiology; 1994; 33(6):305-26. PubMed ID: 7741665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.
    Boege P; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1810-8. PubMed ID: 12002865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
    Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related changes in transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing ears.
    Satoh Y; Kanzaki J; O-Uchi T; Yoshihara S
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 May; 25(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 9673723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of PMCA2 mutation on DPOAE amplitudes and latencies in deafwaddler mice.
    Konrad-Martin D; Norton SJ; Mascher KE; Tempel BL
    Hear Res; 2001 Jan; 151(1-2):205-220. PubMed ID: 11124466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosemide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):914-24. PubMed ID: 12597185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternative distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing loss in a clinical population.
    Lind O
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 10572971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the C57BL/6J mouse model of age-related hearing loss.
    Parham K
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):216-34. PubMed ID: 9367243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):104-15. PubMed ID: 8880185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.