These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12558294)

  • 21. Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.
    Duryea AP; Roberts WW; Cain CA; Tamaddoni HA; Hall TL
    J Endourol; 2014 Jan; 28(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 23957846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Sapozhnikov OA; Khokhlova VA; Bailey MR; Williams JC; McAteer JA; Cleveland RO; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1183-95. PubMed ID: 12243163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a bifocal reflector on a clinical lithotripter.
    Loske AM; Prieto FE; Gutierrez J; Zendejas H; Saita A; Velez Gomez E
    J Endourol; 2004 Feb; 18(1):7-15; discussion 15-6. PubMed ID: 15006046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in-vivo stone comminution.
    Maloney ME; Marguet CG; Zhou Y; Kang DE; Sung JC; Springhart WP; Madden J; Zhong P; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 2006 Sep; 20(9):603-6. PubMed ID: 16999607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A heuristic model of stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Smith NB; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1548-58. PubMed ID: 23927195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improvement of stone fragmentation during shock-wave lithotripsy using a combined EH/PEAA shock-wave generator-in vitro experiments.
    Xi X; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 26(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 10773377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Suppressing bubble shielding effect in shock wave lithotripsy by low intensity pulsed ultrasound.
    Wang JC; Zhou Y
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Jan; 55():65-74. PubMed ID: 25173067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of synchronous twin pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: determination of optimal parameters for in vitro stone fragmentation.
    Sheir KZ; Zabihi N; Lee D; Teichman JM; Rehman J; Sundaram CP; Heimbach D; Hesse A; Delvecchio F; Zhong P; Preminger GM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2190-4. PubMed ID: 14634376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy.
    Cleveland RO; Sapozhnikov OA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2667-76. PubMed ID: 16266186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison?
    Nomikos MS; Sowter SJ; Tolley DA
    BJU Int; 2007 Dec; 100(6):1356-60. PubMed ID: 17850387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The Dornier lithotripter in a comparison. Measuring shockwave fields and fragmentation effects].
    Müller M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990 Nov; 35(11):250-62. PubMed ID: 2073536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative measurements of acoustic emissions from cavitation at the surface of a stone in response to a lithotripter shock wave.
    Chitnis PV; Cleveland RO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1929-32. PubMed ID: 16642802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bifocal reflector for electrohydraulic lithotripters.
    Prieto FE; Loske AM
    J Endourol; 1999 Mar; 13(2):65-75. PubMed ID: 10213098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.
    Li G; Williams JC; Pishchalnikov YA; Liu Z; McAteer JA
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E871-7. PubMed ID: 22938566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.
    Neisius A; Wöllner J; Thomas C; Roos FC; Brenner W; Hampel C; Preminger GM; Thüroff JW; Gillitzer R
    BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):972-81. PubMed ID: 24118958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Renal Stone Comminution and Injury by Burst Wave Lithotripsy in a Pig Model.
    Maxwell AD; Wang YN; Kreider W; Cunitz BW; Starr F; Lee D; Nazari Y; Williams JC; Bailey MR; Sorensen MD
    J Endourol; 2019 Oct; 33(10):787-792. PubMed ID: 31016998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modified shock waves for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a simulation based on the Gilmore formulation.
    Canseco G; de Icaza-Herrera M; Fernández F; Loske AM
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Oct; 51(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 21459398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Urolithiasis--a change in therapeutic methods extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using a Dornier kidney lithotripter HM3].
    Yamamoto K; Kishimoto T; Sakamoto W; Sugimoto T; Iimori H; Kanasawa T; Wada S; Senju M; Nakatani T; Sugimura K
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1989 Dec; 35(12):2093-8. PubMed ID: 2618909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What makes a shock wave efficient in lithotripsy?
    Granz B; Köhler G
    J Stone Dis; 1992 Apr; 4(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 10149177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera.
    Bohris C; Roosen A; Dickmann M; Hocaoglu Y; Sandner S; Bader M; Stief CG; Walther S
    J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 22100005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.