These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12558320)

  • 1. Hemolysis in needleless connectors for phlebotomy.
    Sharp MK; Mohammad SF
    ASAIO J; 2003; 49(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 12558320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of sharp safety blood evacuation devices.
    Ford J; Phillips P
    Nurs Stand; 2011 Jun 29-Jul 5; 25(43):41-7. PubMed ID: 21847867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of hemolysis rates using intravenous catheters versus venipuncture tubes for obtaining blood samples.
    Kennedy C; Angermuller S; King R; Noviello S; Walker J; Warden J; Vang S
    J Emerg Nurs; 1996 Dec; 22(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 9060320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood samples drawn from newly placed IV sites in the emergency department.
    Dugan L; Leech L; Speroni KG; Corriher J
    J Emerg Nurs; 2005 Aug; 31(4):338-45. PubMed ID: 16126097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preanalytic Factors Associated With Hemolysis in Emergency Department Blood Samples.
    Phelan MP; Reineks EZ; Schold JD; Hustey FM; Chamberlin J; Procop GW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Feb; 142(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 29106292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The potential for catheter microbial contamination from a needleless connector.
    Brown JD; Moss HA; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 1997 Jul; 36(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 9253699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of needles in the practice of anesthesiology and the effect of a needleless intravenous administration system.
    Berry AJ
    Anesth Analg; 1993 May; 76(5):1114-9. PubMed ID: 8484516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevention of hemolysis in blood samples collected from intravenous catheters.
    Lippi G; Avanzini P; Cervellin G
    Clin Biochem; 2013 May; 46(7-8):561-4. PubMed ID: 23391635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of butterfly needles to draw blood is independently associated with marked reduction in hemolysis compared to intravenous catheter.
    Wollowitz A; Bijur PE; Esses D; John Gallagher E
    Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24238318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector.
    Casey AL; Worthington T; Lambert PA; Quinn D; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
    J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 12919759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of fluid reflux after flushing different types of needleless connectors.
    Elli S; Abbruzzese C; Cannizzo L; Lucchini A
    J Vasc Access; 2016 Sep; 17(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 27443579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related thrombotic occlusions.
    Btaiche IF; Kovacevich DS; Khalidi N; Papke LF
    J Infus Nurs; 2011; 34(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 21399454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.
    Ippolito G; De Carli G; Puro V; Petrosillo N; Arici C; Bertucci R; Bianciardi L; Bonazzi L; Cestrone A; Daglio M
    JAMA; 1994 Aug 24-31; 272(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 8057516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related bloodstream infections.
    Btaiche IF; Kovacevich DS; Khalidi N; Papke LF
    Am J Infect Control; 2011 May; 39(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 21256629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparison of the rates of hemolysis and repeated blood sampling using syringe needles versus vacuum tube needles in the emergency department].
    Sung YH; Hwang MS; Lee JH; Park HD; Ryu KH; Cho MS; Yi YH; Song S
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2012 Jun; 42(3):443-51. PubMed ID: 22854557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safer needles work, but not penetrating market.
    AIDS Alert; 1997 Mar; 12(3):27-30. PubMed ID: 11364188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbiologic evaluation of needleless and needle-access devices.
    Arduino MJ; Bland LA; Danzig LE; McAllister SK; Aguero SM
    Am J Infect Control; 1997 Oct; 25(5):377-80. PubMed ID: 9343619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Hemolysis in blood samples. Assessment in 3 extraction systems].
    Romero Ruiz A; Tronchoni de los Llanos J; Sánchez Negrete J
    Rev Enferm; 2004 Mar; 27(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 15125339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap.
    Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 16418982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Novel Needle-Free Blood Draw Device for Sample Collection From Short Peripheral Catheters.
    Cadacio C; Nachamkin I
    J Infus Nurs; 2017; 40(3):156-162. PubMed ID: 28419012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.