These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12558811)

  • 1. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases.
    Dietschi D; Olsburgh S; Krejci I; Davidson C
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Feb; 111(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 12558811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.
    Sandoval MJ; Rocca GT; Krejci I; Mandikos M; Dietschi D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2167-77. PubMed ID: 25877233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. "Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations".
    Rocca GT; Gregor L; Sandoval MJ; Krejci I; Dietschi D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct; 16(5):1385-93. PubMed ID: 22065245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing.
    Dietschi D; Herzfeld D
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Dec; 106(6):1033-42. PubMed ID: 9879916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test.
    Dietschi D; Moor L
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 11725685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations.
    Dietschi D; Bindi G; Krejci I; Davidson C
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 12216570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal and internal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    J Dent; 2003 May; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 12735916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.
    Bott B; Hannig M
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 12686289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal characteristics of different filling materials and filling methods with standardized cavity preparation.
    Stoll R; Remes H; Kunzelmann KH; Stachniss V
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11317400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
    Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
    Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars.
    el-Kalla IH
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10477997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.