These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12559166)

  • 1. On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence.
    Jager G; Postma A
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(4):504-15. PubMed ID: 12559166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: a reappraisal.
    Rybash JM; Hoyer WJ
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 1508052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: an fMRI study.
    van der Ham IJ; Raemaekers M; van Wezel RJ; Oleksiak A; Postma A
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1297():70-9. PubMed ID: 19651111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 11970792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time course of hemispheric differences in categorical and coordinate spatial processing.
    van der Ham IJ; van Wezel RJ; Oleksiak A; Postma A
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2492-8. PubMed ID: 17499820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric contribution to categorical and coordinate representational processes: a study on brain-damaged patients.
    Palermo L; Bureca I; Matano A; Guariglia C
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2802-7. PubMed ID: 18614187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations.
    Kosslyn SM; Koenig O; Barrett A; Cave CB; Tang J; Gabrieli JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):723-35. PubMed ID: 2531207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The study of hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations in animals.
    Vauclair J; Yamazaki Y; Güntürkün O
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16516247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct neural networks underlie encoding of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations during active navigation.
    Baumann O; Chan E; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1630-7. PubMed ID: 22300811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grid/no-grid working memory paradigm.
    Martin R; Houssemand C; Schiltz C; Burnod Y; Alexandre F
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):576-94. PubMed ID: 18037455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric preponderance in categorical and coordinate visual processes.
    Parrot M; Doyon B; Démonet JF; Cardebat D
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Oct; 37(11):1215-25. PubMed ID: 10530722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A possible connection between categorical and coordinate spatial relation representations.
    Niebauer CL
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):434-45. PubMed ID: 11748899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorical and coordinate spatial representations within object-location memory.
    van Asselen M; Kessels RP; Kappelle LJ; Postma A
    Cortex; 2008 Mar; 44(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 18387555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1576-82. PubMed ID: 15601520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lateralisation of spatial processing and age.
    Meadmore KL; Dror IE; Bucks RS
    Laterality; 2009 Jan; 14(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 19130638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lateralization of spatial categories: a comparison of verbal and visuospatial categorical relations.
    van der Ham IJ; Postma A
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jul; 38(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 20551338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Varying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Borst G; Kosslyn SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2769-72. PubMed ID: 20434469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in spatial relation processing: effects of strategy, ability, and gender.
    van der Ham IJ; Borst G
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jun; 76(1):184-90. PubMed ID: 21353361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prefrontal cortex hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate visual spatial memory.
    Slotnick SD; Moo LR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1560-8. PubMed ID: 16516248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric asymmetry in categorical versus coordinate visuospatial processing revealed by temporary cortical deactivation.
    Slotnick SD; Moo LR; Tesoro MA; Hart J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 13(8):1088-96. PubMed ID: 11784447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.