142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12559517)
1. Intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning for dynamic multileaf collimator delivery: influence of different parameters on dose distributions.
Samuelsson A; Johansson KA
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Jan; 66(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 12559517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model.
Fogliata A; Bolsi A; Cozzi L
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Jan; 66(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 12559518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can photon IMRT be improved by combination with mixed electron and photon techniques?
Mu X; Olofsson L; Karlsson M; Sjögren R; Zackrisson B
Acta Oncol; 2004; 43(8):727-35. PubMed ID: 15764217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensity modulation with the "step and shoot" technique using a commercial MLC: a planning study. Multileaf collimator.
Keller-Reichenbecher MA; Bortfeld T; Levegrün S; Stein J; Preiser K; Schlegel W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1315-24. PubMed ID: 10613328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours.
Seco J; Clark CH; Evans PM; Webb S
Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):401-8. PubMed ID: 16632620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study.
Wu Q; Manning M; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 10656393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of the number of control points has on isodose distributions in a dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery.
Goraj A; de Boer SF
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 22572212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo based modulated electron beam treatment planning using a few-leaf electron collimator--feasibility study.
Al-Yahya K; Hristov D; Verhaegen F; Seuntjens J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):847-57. PubMed ID: 15798259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of random set-up errors in Monte Carlo calculated dynamic IMRT treatment plans.
Stapleton S; Zavgorodni S; Popescu IA; Beckham WA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 50(3):429-39. PubMed ID: 15773721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate doses to head-and-neck cancers: what is the maximal dose?
Zhou J; Fei D; Wu Q
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 14529771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors.
Boyer AL; Geis P; Grant W; Carol M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):227-36. PubMed ID: 9300758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Algorithms for optimal sequencing of dynamic multileaf collimators.
Kamath S; Sahni S; Palta J; Ranka S
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(1):33-54. PubMed ID: 14971771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design of a fast multileaf collimator for radiobiological optimized IMRT with scanned beams of photons, electrons, and light ions.
Svensson R; Larsson S; Gudowska I; Holmberg R; Brahme A
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):877-88. PubMed ID: 17441233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
