These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12561395)
1. Regulatory oversight of case management services and other medical management functions. Carneal G Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(4):49-54. PubMed ID: 12561395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining the parameters of case management in a managed care setting. Carneal G; D'Andrea G Manag Care Q; 2001; 9(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 11252397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. APA resource document: II. Regulatory guidelines for protecting the interests of psychiatric patients in emerging health care systems. Hoge SK Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 8889139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A case study of state managed care regulation: utilization review laws. Snyder MA Benefits Q; 1992; 8(2):16-25. PubMed ID: 10118724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Review firms under review. Kenkel PJ Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(36):98. PubMed ID: 10106189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Design of legal audits for utilization management. Neiditz JA; Schaffer WA Benefits Q; 1991; 7(4):48-57. PubMed ID: 10116957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Devolution and distrust: managed care and the resurgence of physician power and authority. Ameringer CF DePaul J Health Care Law; 2002; 5(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 14696646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulating managed care firms: the Connecticut plan. Fields JA; Kramer JA Benefits Q; 1992; 8(2):26-35. PubMed ID: 10118725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disease management and antikickback regulations. Kozma CM Manag Care Interface; 2003 Dec; 16(12):34-5. PubMed ID: 14750462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bargaining with Hippocrates: managed care and the doctor-patient relationship. Hall TS S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(3):689-740. PubMed ID: 15214354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physicians, bound and gagged: federal attempts to combat managed care's use of gag clauses. Picinic NJ Seton Hall Legis J; 1997; 21(2):567-620. PubMed ID: 11863021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ERISA preemption of medical negligence claims against managed care providers: the search for an effective theory and an appropriate remedy. Minc GJ J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 10160178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Case management's legal considerations. Blum JD Bus Health; 1989 Sep; 7(9):44. PubMed ID: 10294582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Liability concerns in managed care. Benesch K N J Med; 1996 Nov; 93(11):57-60. PubMed ID: 8961747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review and managed care. Waxman JM Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1988; 21(4):48-9. PubMed ID: 10288317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilization management appeals and liability. Elden DL Health Care Innov; 1999; 9(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 10557529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The two faces of gag provisions: patients and physicians in a bind. Brand GS; Munoz GM; Nichols MG; Okata MU; Pitt JB; Seager S Yale Law Policy Rev; 1998; 17():249-80. PubMed ID: 16437824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Finance issue brief: medical necessity: year end report-2003. MacEachern L Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-26. PubMed ID: 14964236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]