These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12562067)

  • 21. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
    Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Total surface bearing below-knee prosthesis: advantages, disadvantages, and clinical implications.
    Hachisuka K; Dozono K; Ogata H; Ohmine S; Shitama H; Shinkoda K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Jul; 79(7):783-9. PubMed ID: 9685091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses.
    Baars EC; Geertzen JH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 16180375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Outcome of fitting an ICEROSS prosthesis: views of trans-tibial amputees.
    Datta D; Vaidya SK; Howitt J; Gopalan L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1996 Aug; 20(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 8876004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pressure distribution at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees during walking on stairs, slope and non-flat road.
    Dou P; Jia X; Suo S; Wang R; Zhang M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1067-73. PubMed ID: 16919376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of CAD-CAM and hand made sockets for PTB prostheses.
    Köhler P; Lindh L; Netz P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Apr; 13(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2717380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Below knee prosthetic socket designs and suspension systems.
    Edwards ML
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):585-93, vi. PubMed ID: 10989480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
    Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tibial forces measured in vivo after total knee arthroplasty.
    D'Lima DD; Patil S; Steklov N; Slamin JE; Colwell CW
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Feb; 21(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 16520216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conventional patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee.
    Convery P; Buis AW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 9881607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
    Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical evaluation of an adjustable patellar tendon bearing prosthesis.
    Mizrahi J; Susak Z; Bahar A; Seliktar R; Najenson T
    Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1985; 12():117-23. PubMed ID: 3868036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mapping Lower-Limb Prosthesis Load Distributions Using a Low-Cost Pressure Measurement System.
    Hopkins MO; Turner S; Vaidyanathan R; McGregor A
    Front Med Technol; 2022; 4():908002. PubMed ID: 35782578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
    Vogt JC; Saarbach C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of alignment perturbations in a trans-tibial prosthesis user: A pilot study.
    Courtney A; Orendurff MS; Buis A
    J Rehabil Med; 2016 Apr; 48(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 26983760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Design and analysis of orthogonally compliant features for local contact pressure relief in transtibial prostheses.
    Faustini MC; Crawford RH; Neptune RR; Rogers WE; Bosker G
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Nov; 127(6):946-51. PubMed ID: 16438231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs--Part 2: Quantitative outcomes.
    Safari MR; Meier MR
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(5):509-26. PubMed ID: 26436733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Static and dynamic pressure profiles of a patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket.
    Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 12666779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prosthetic fitting in a patient with a transtibial amputation due to a congenital vascular malformation of the right leg.
    Simmelink EK; Rommers GM; Gardeniers JW; Zijlstra H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Apr; 38(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 23986465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized prostheses.
    Graves S; Sedrakyan A; Baste V; Gioe TJ; Namba R; Martínez Cruz O; Stea S; Paxton E; Banerjee S; Isaacs AJ; Robertsson O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25520420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.