468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12562375)
1. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.
Heydecke G; Boudrias P; Awad MA; De Albuquerque RF; Lund JP; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 12562375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage: patient-based outcomes.
de Albuquerque Júnior RF; Lund JP; Tang L; Larivée J; de Grandmont P; Gauthier G; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Dec; 11(6):555-65. PubMed ID: 11168249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: psychometric evaluation and patient preference.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1997 Oct; 76(10):1675-83. PubMed ID: 9326900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech with maxillary implant prostheses: ratings of articulation.
Heydecke G; McFarland DH; Feine JS; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 2004 Mar; 83(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 14981126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses: zygomatic versus conventional implants.
Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Martí E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 17974111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: choice of prosthesis.
Feine JS; de Grandmont P; Boudrias P; Brien N; LaMarche C; Taché R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 May; 73(5):1105-11. PubMed ID: 8006238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-supported maxillary denture retained by a telescopic abutment system: A clinical report.
Morandi R; Cabral LM; de Moraes M
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):331-334. PubMed ID: 27692580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part I: patients' assessments.
Zitzmann NU; Marinello CP
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 10756292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures.
Brennan M; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; O'Connell B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 20657876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An implant-supported fixed-removable prosthesis with a milled tissue bar and Hader clip retention as a restorative option for the edentulous maxilla.
Davodi A; Nishimura R; Beumer J
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Aug; 78(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 9260141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Provisional implants for anchoring removable interim prostheses in edentulous jaws: a clinical study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Schmidinger S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 12939013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures.
Amaral CF; Pinheiro MA; de Moraes M; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1383-1389. PubMed ID: 30427971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Within-Subject Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Between a Two-Implant Overdenture and a Three-Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis in the Mandible.
Beresford D; Klineberg I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1374-1382. PubMed ID: 30427970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: psychometric evaluation.
de Grandmont P; Feine JS; Taché R; Boudrias P; Donohue WB; Tanguay R; Lund JP
J Dent Res; 1994 May; 73(5):1096-104. PubMed ID: 8006237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximum use of the anterior maxillary buttress in severe maxillary atrophy with tilted, palatally positioned implants: a preliminary study.
Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Peñarrocha M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 20657879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.
Fortin Y; Sullivan RM; Rangert BR
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 12121606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design.
Zitzmann NU; Marinello CP
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 10424983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
