145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12563158)
1. Artifacts at PET and PET/CT caused by metallic hip prosthetic material.
Goerres GW; Ziegler SI; Burger C; Berthold T; Von Schulthess GK; Buck A
Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):577-84. PubMed ID: 12563158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of iterative reconstruction, attenuation correction, and image fusion in the interpretation of FDG PET images with an integrated dual-head coincidence camera and X-ray-based attenuation maps.
Delbeke D; Martin WH; Patton JA; Sandler MP
Radiology; 2001 Jan; 218(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 11152796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A virtual sinogram method to reduce dental metallic implant artefacts in computed tomography-based attenuation correction for PET.
Abdoli M; Ay MR; Ahmadian A; Zaidi H
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19829166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.
Kinahan PE; Hasegawa BH; Beyer T
Semin Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 33(3):166-79. PubMed ID: 12931319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do hardware artefacts influence the performance of head and neck PET scans in patients with oral cavity squamous cell cancer?
Goerres GW; Schmid DT; Eyrich GK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):365-71. PubMed ID: 15070838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metal Artifact Reduction of CT Scans to Improve PET/CT.
van der Vos CS; Arens AIJ; Hamill JJ; Hofmann C; Panin VY; Meeuwis APW; Visser EP; de Geus-Oei LF
J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 28490470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts.
Beyer T; Bockisch A; Kühl H; Martinez MJ
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16391192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of metal artefact reduction on CT-based attenuation correction for PET imaging in the vicinity of metallic hip implants: a phantom study.
Harnish R; Prevrhal S; Alavi A; Zaidi H; Lang TF
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 28(6):540-50. PubMed ID: 24710757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of nonionic intravenous contrast agents at PET/CT imaging: phantom and canine studies.
Nakamoto Y; Chin BB; Kraitchman DL; Lawler LP; Marshall LT; Wahl RL
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):817-24. PubMed ID: 12773683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography potential pitfalls and artifacts.
Wang X; Koch S
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2009; 38(4):156-69. PubMed ID: 19464586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reduction of artifacts due to metal hip implants in CT-attenuation corrected PET images from hybrid PET/CT scanners.
Kennedy JA; Israel O; Frenkel A; Bar-Shalom R; Azhari H
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2007 Jun; 45(6):553-62. PubMed ID: 17520306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pediatric FDG PET/CT: physiologic uptake, normal variants, and benign conditions.
Shammas A; Lim R; Charron M
Radiographics; 2009; 29(5):1467-86. PubMed ID: 19755606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Truncation artifact on PET/CT: impact on measurements of activity concentration and assessment of a correction algorithm.
Mawlawi O; Erasmus JJ; Pan T; Cody DD; Campbell R; Lonn AH; Kohlmyer S; Macapinlac HA; Podoloff DA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 May; 186(5):1458-67. PubMed ID: 16632745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PET/CT in diagnostic oncology.
Messa C; Bettinardi V; Picchio M; Pelosi E; Landoni C; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC; Fazio F
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jun; 48(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 15243404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of different metal artifact reduction techniques on attenuation correction in 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.
Martin O; Aissa J; Boos J; Wingendorf K; Latz D; Buchbender C; Gaspers S; Antke C; Sedlmair M; Antoch G; Schaarschmidt BM
Br J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 93(1105):20190069. PubMed ID: 31642702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metallic artifacts caused by dental metal prostheses on PET images: a PET/CT phantom study using different PET/CT scanners.
Shimamoto H; Kakimoto N; Fujino K; Hamada S; Shimosegawa E; Murakami S; Furukawa S; Hatazawa J
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 23(5):443-9. PubMed ID: 19399580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomographic metal artifact reduction for the detection and quantitation of small features near large metallic implants: a comparison of published methods.
Rinkel J; Dillon WP; Funk T; Gould R; Prevrhal S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 18664852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of metal artifacts from hip prostheses on CT images of the pelvis: value of iterative reconstructions.
Morsbach F; Bickelhaupt S; Wanner GA; Krauss A; Schmidt B; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2013 Jul; 268(1):237-44. PubMed ID: 23513244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suppression of metal artifacts in CT using a reconstruction procedure that combines MAP and projection completion.
Lemmens C; Faul D; Nuyts J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Feb; 28(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 19188112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The integration of PET-CT scans from different hospitals into radiotherapy treatment planning.
Ollers M; Bosmans G; van Baardwijk A; Dekker A; Lambin P; Teule J; Thimister W; Rhamy A; De Ruysscher D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Apr; 87(1):142-6. PubMed ID: 18207269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
