These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12564339)

  • 41. Radiation protection at nuclear fuel cycle facilities.
    Endo K; Momose T; Furuta S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):119-22. PubMed ID: 21498413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effective radiological contamination control and monitoring techniques in high alpha environments.
    Funke KC
    Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S25-9. PubMed ID: 12564343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. 3D simulation as a tool for improving the safety culture during remediation work at Andreeva Bay.
    Chizhov K; Sneve MK; Szőke I; Mazur I; Mark NK; Kudrin I; Shandala N; Simakov A; Smith GM; Krasnoschekov A; Kosnikov A; Kemsky I; Kryuchkov V
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Dec; 34(4):755-73. PubMed ID: 25254659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [RADIATION HYGIENIC MONITORING AT THE AREA OF THE LOCATION OF THE FAR EASTERN CENTER FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT (FEC "DALRAO"--BRANCH OF FSUE "ROSRAO")].
    Kiselev SM; Shandala NK; Akhromeev SV; Gimadova TI; Seregin VA; Titov AV; Biryukova NG
    Gig Sanit; 2015; 94(5):49-52. PubMed ID: 26625616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [RADIATION SAFETY DURING REMEDIATION OF THE "SEVRAO" FACILITIES].
    Shandala NK; Kiselev SM; Titov AV; Simakov AV; Seregin VA; Kryuchkov VP; Bogdanova LS; Grachev MI
    Gig Sanit; 2015; 94(5):10-6. PubMed ID: 26625607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Design and verification of shielding for the advanced spent fuel conditioning process facility.
    Cho IJ; Kook DH; Kwon KC; Lee EP; Choung WM; You GS
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5 Suppl 2):S65-71. PubMed ID: 18403959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Routine dose estimates for the removal of soil from a basin to the burial ground at the Savannah River Site.
    Simpkins AA
    Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2 Suppl):S53-6. PubMed ID: 14744072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A biosphere assessment of high-level radioactive waste disposal in Sweden.
    Kautsky U; Lindborg T; Valentin J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25431486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Design and operation of the internal dosimetry program for the Chornobyl 'shelter implementation plan'.
    Likhtarev I; Berkovski V; Kovgan L; Tcygankov N; Ratia G; Bonchuk Y; Nechaev S; Perevoznikov O; Ariasov P; Vasilenko V; Rubel N; Kairo I; Gorbachev S; Volkernuk T; Sushko V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):321-4. PubMed ID: 17686964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of the neutron spectrum and dose assessment around the venus reactor.
    Coeck M; Vermeersch F; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):76-9. PubMed ID: 16381686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Medical and radiological aspects of emergency preparedness and response at SevRAO facilities.
    Savkin MN; Sneve MK; Grachev MI; Frolov GP; Shinkarev SM; Jaworska A
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 19029584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Waste disposal and the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection - challenges for radioecology and environmental radiation protection.
    Larsson CM
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1053-7. PubMed ID: 19643515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Radiation protection challenges in the management of radioactive waste from high-energy accelerators.
    Ulrici L; Algoet Y; Bruno L; Magistris M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):112-5. PubMed ID: 25377753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Default operational intervention levels (OILs) for severe nuclear power plant or spent fuel pool emergencies.
    McKenna T; Kutkov V; Vilar Welter P; Dodd B; Buglova E
    Health Phys; 2013 May; 104(5):459-70. PubMed ID: 23532075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Decommissioning of the High Flux Beam Reactor at Brookhaven National Laboratory.
    Hu JP; Reciniello RN; Holden NE
    Health Phys; 2012 Aug; 103(2 Suppl 2):S151-60. PubMed ID: 22739969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reactor-based management of used nuclear fuel: assessment of major options.
    Finck PJ; Wigeland RA; Hill RN
    Health Phys; 2011 Jan; 100(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21399411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A respiratory model for uranium aluminide based on occupational data.
    Leggett RW; Eckerman KF; Boice JD
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 16340069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Benchmarking of MCNP for calculating dose rates at an interim storage facility for nuclear waste.
    Heuel-Fabianek B; Hille R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):424-7. PubMed ID: 16381760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conservatism in effective dose calculations for accident events involving fuel reprocessing waste tanks.
    Bevelacqua JJ
    Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 21617391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neutron activation of patients following boron neutron capture therapy of brain tumors at the high flux reactor (HFR) Petten (EORTC Trials 11961 and 11011).
    Wittig A; Moss RL; Stecher-Rasmussen F; Appelman K; Rassow J; Roca A; Sauerwein W
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Dec; 181(12):774-82. PubMed ID: 16362787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.