These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12564443)

  • 1. Fairness and health care decision making: testing the group value model of procedural justice.
    Murphy-Berman V; Cross T; Fondacaro M
    Soc Justice Res; 1999 Jun; 12(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 12564443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Justice in health care decision-making: patients' appraisals of health care providers and health plan representatives.
    Fondacaro M; Frogner B; Moos R
    Soc Justice Res; 2005 Mar; 18(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 16021741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome fairness and procedural fairness.
    Bianchi EC; Brockner J; van den Bos K; Seifert M; Moon H; van Dijke M; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 25387762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Justice judgements, school failure, and adolescent deviant behaviour.
    Sanches C; Gouveia-Pereira M; Carugati F
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2012 Dec; 82(Pt 4):606-21. PubMed ID: 23025395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conceptualizations of fairness and legitimacy in the context of Ethiopian health priority setting: Reflections on the applicability of accountability for reasonableness.
    Petricca K; Bekele A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 28544136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Justice orientation as a moderator of the framing effect on procedural justice perception.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 24873027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions.
    Ambrose ML; Cropanzano R
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 12731710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moderating the interaction between procedural justice and decision frame: the counterbalancing effect of personality traits.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(2):125-51. PubMed ID: 23469475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.
    Heuer L; Penrod S; Kattan A
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):573-610. PubMed ID: 17245632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedural justice and quality of life in compensation processes.
    Elbers NA; Akkermans AJ; Cuijpers P; Bruinvels DJ
    Injury; 2013 Nov; 44(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 22975157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision frame and procedural justice: interactive effects on perceptions of distributive justice.
    Flint DH; Cole ND
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Oct; 93(2):631-7. PubMed ID: 14650697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotional reactions toward procedural fairness as a function of negative information.
    De Cremer D; Ruiter RA
    J Soc Psychol; 2003 Dec; 143(6):793-5. PubMed ID: 14658754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge.
    See KE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 19210067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between perceived organizational justice and moral distress in intensive care unit nurses.
    Haghighinezhad G; Atashzadeh-Shoorideh F; Ashktorab T; Mohtashami J; Barkhordari-Sharifabad M
    Nurs Ethics; 2019 Mar; 26(2):460-470. PubMed ID: 28752794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.
    Brockner J; Wiesenfeld BM
    Psychol Bull; 1996 Sep; 120(2):189-208. PubMed ID: 8831296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanisms linking authentic leadership to emotional exhaustion: The role of procedural justice and emotional demands in a moderated mediation approach.
    Kampa J; Rigotti T; Otto K
    Ind Health; 2017 Apr; 55(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 27818452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The construction of feelings of justice in environmental management: An empirical study of multiple biodiversity conflicts in Calakmul, Mexico.
    Lecuyer L; White RM; Schmook B; Lemay V; Calmé S
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():363-373. PubMed ID: 29502021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
    Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: an analogue study.
    Cascardi M; Poythress NG; Hall A
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):731-40. PubMed ID: 11180419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.